Article View: ca.environment
Article #6988What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
From: jbodnarc
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 1995 00:00
62 lines
3533 bytes
3533 bytes
JI>In ca.environment dlow@ppg01.sc.hp.com (Danny Low) said: JI> JI> JI>>When it comes JI>>to environmental destruction, the West came no where near what the JI>Communist JI>>did in Eastern Europe and Russia. When it comes to fighting environmental JI>>destruction the West is 50 years ahead of not only the Communist but the JI>new JI>>democratic Russians. Pollution of the Caspian Sea still continues JI>unchecked JI>>today. JI>> JI>> JI> JI> JI>This is true. We have certainly shown a great deal more intellegence and JI>forsight in our attempts to improve on the environment than many countries. JI>Although the United States is perhaps not the best at these things (I think JI>maybe Holland and New Zealand are better), we have done alot. We should be JI>proud of these efforts and try to build on them. Environmental wellbeing is JI>something which is a benefit to You would be surprised...Ever considered how many nuclear bombs you people have "tested" in other countries? You have destroyed Micronesia. It was once a beautiful place. Now there is so much fall out from the fifty or so years of american nuclear bombardment that the islands now resemble a shadow of what they used to be. Ever wondered how many oil spills were caused by your peoples unending quest for more and more oil (and money and wasted energy)? Consider the Exxon Valdez...I know that that's nothing compared to the Russian Oil line explosion in the Arctic, but consider how long your own alaskan pipeline is and what might happen if it were to explode? Don't beleive the hype that americans are far superior in any way to everybody else. How much land are has your government designated as park lands? Compare that to other countries and you'll find that even Sweden, a country much smaller than yours, has designated more land towards nature than america has, given the fact that Sweden is a much smaller nation. Take for example Niagara Falls. Compare Niagara Falls New York to Niagara Falls Canada. The Canadian government has designated the entire region to be park land, some of which can be used legally as commercial lands. The place is green all over. Unfortunately so is the water. This is where the americans come in. America decided that it would build industrial sites along the Niagara River and in that region. Not only does the infamous Love Canal are exist in the american Niagara region, but so do at least 50 or so known chemical and toxic waste sites built right along the river. You people are responsible for dumping huge amounts of Dioxin into the Niagra, which flows into Lake Ontario...Drinking water for about 6 million people on the Canadian side, countless more on your side. And dioxin isn't even the start. There are large amounts of mercury and lead. Although Canada, more specifically, Toronto, is also responsible for some of the pollution in Lake Ontario, science has shown us that america dumps at least 75 percent of all chemical and toxic pollution in lake Ontario into the lake. And you consider yourselves to be much more intelligent? Wake up and drink Lake Ontario water. JMB
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<787735027802@milliken-mills.markham.on.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jbodnarc@milliken-mills.markham.on.ca Subject: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology Date: 1995/06/05 Message-ID: <787735027802@milliken-mills.markham.on.ca> X-Deja-AN: 103950988 newsgroups: ca.environment