🚀 go-pugleaf

 
 
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: 
 
 
>In article <3pifpj$b38@worm.hooked.net> jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim
Barrett)  
>writes: 
>    >...avoid the notion of regulations. On the other hand if 
>    >"biodiversity" does have benefits and I am the one who paid 
>    >for it I should, according to free market principles, be the 
>    >one who gains from it. If I buy trees and they produce oxygen 
>    >I should be able to charge for my oxygen. This would be 
>    >similar to they way that those who own water are able to 
>    >charge for it. 
> 
>Well, it probably would be a zero sum game, as you'd have to pay for the
CO2  
>used by your trees ... 
> 
> 
 
I would be a value added seller. There is always a markup when you take
materials and put them together and create a new more desirable product.