Article View: ca.environment
Article #7045Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
From: Jim Barrett
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00
28 lines
1301 bytes
1301 bytes
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: >In article <3pidob$8jd@worm.hooked.net> jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) >writes: > >... No more wars should be paid for by the tax payers to > >protect oil investments. > >I am unaware of a war ever fought for "protection of oil investments". Of >course, this catch phrase is used by the ecofascists in their propaganda >efforts a lot ... Since I have not suggested imposing anything on anybody I don't suspect that I am considered to be a facist of anysort. If there was never any wars fought over "protection of oil investments" then my statement is not relevent to this discussion and I'll retract it. I still maintain my point that if we are to suggest eliminating subsidies for mass transit we should be consistant and eliminate subsidies for all forms of transportation.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3pinbo$ini@worm.hooked.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<philD8t7vD.JEF@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology Date: 1995/05/19 Message-ID: <3pinbo$ini@worm.hooked.net> X-Deja-AN: 102983236 references: <philD8t7vD.JEF@netcom.com> organization: hooked newsgroups: ca.environment