🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.environment
Article #7045

Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology

#7045
From: Jim Barrett
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00
28 lines
1301 bytes
 
 
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: 
 
 
>In article <3pidob$8jd@worm.hooked.net> jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim
Barrett)  
>writes: 
>    >... No more wars should be paid for by the tax payers to 
>    >protect oil investments. 
> 
>I am unaware of a war ever fought for "protection of oil investments". Of 

>course, this catch phrase is used by the ecofascists in their propaganda  
>efforts a lot ... 
 
 
Since I have not suggested imposing anything on anybody I don't suspect
that I am considered to be a facist of anysort. 
 
If there was never any wars fought over "protection of oil investments"
then my statement is not relevent to this discussion and I'll retract it. 
 
I still maintain my point that if we are to suggest eliminating subsidies
for mass transit we should be consistant and eliminate subsidies for all
forms of transportation. 
 
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3pinbo$ini@worm.hooked.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <philD8t7vD.JEF@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
From: jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim Barrett)
Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property?  Ecology
Date: 1995/05/19
Message-ID: <3pinbo$ini@worm.hooked.net>
X-Deja-AN: 102983236
references: <philD8t7vD.JEF@netcom.com>
organization: hooked
newsgroups: ca.environment