Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology

Article View: ca.environment

Article #7052

#7052

From: Jim Barrett
Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 00:00

28 lines
1454 bytes

 
 
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: 
 
 
>In article <3p0gku$33a@tuna.hooked.net> jimbar@tuna.hooked.net (Jim
Barrett)  
>writes: 
>    >Secondly, the notion that the Indigenous peoples of North 
>    >America were ever "justly compensated" for what was taken 
>    >from them is not true. For instance the Black Hills, which... 
> 
>But of course, what the author amusingly refers to as "Indigenous" people
are  
>of course, the THIRD wave of immigrants to America. The third wave wiped
out  
>the second wave, which wiped out the first. 
> 
>I assume that any reparations paid to the third wave will be used to at
least  
>compensate the second wave. 
> 
> 
> 
 
So it seems that you agree that they were not justly compensatated but you
think it is ok since they were not the original inhabitants. Therefore the
notion of private property is secondary to the notion of force.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3p7t67$r6e@tuna.hooked.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3o6o2b$4e2@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <3o90p5$5pr@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <3o9d86$m0q@rational.rational.com> <3olknk$dcs@news.annex.com><3opsqo$98@news.informix.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
From: jimbar@tuna.hooked.net (Jim Barrett)
Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
Date: 1995/05/15
Message-ID: <3p7t67$r6e@tuna.hooked.net>
X-Deja-AN: 102749958
references: <3o6o2b$4e2@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <3o90p5$5pr@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <3o9d86$m0q@rational.rational.com> <3olknk$dcs@news.annex.com><3opsqo$98@news.informix.com>
organization: hooked
newsgroups: ca.environment

Reply to Parent Message