Article View: ca.environment
Article #7055Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
From: Jim Barrett
Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 00:00
26 lines
1598 bytes
1598 bytes
In ca.environment phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: >Boy, it's been so long since I've engage in the futile process of "logical >argument" with ecofreaks that I've forgotten how important irrational thought >is to 'em. > These types of comments are of little value. If we all agree to avoid the personal attacts and stick to the arguement at hand we may be able to make some progress. My thinking is that there is some need to figure out what we all agree on and learn to start there as a basis. Once we find some common ground we can learn to make some compromises and perhaps learn to actually change some of our ways of looking at the world. This will allow us to come up with some system of social interaction where we can learn to get along. If we degenerate into simply attacking each other we will all be worse off. I suggest that we try to look at ways that induce the free market system to promote environmental well being while at the same time preserve notions of private property. I beleive that this suggestion has something for everybody.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3p84gi$508@tuna.hooked.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3ou1bl$b3n@hprcl192.mayfield.hp.com> <philD8G5M7.G44@netcom.com> <3p08vv$e2p@rational.rational.com><philD8J9J8.9wt@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jimbar@tuna.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology Date: 1995/05/15 Message-ID: <3p84gi$508@tuna.hooked.net> X-Deja-AN: 102749961 references: <3ou1bl$b3n@hprcl192.mayfield.hp.com> <philD8G5M7.G44@netcom.com> <3p08vv$e2p@rational.rational.com><philD8J9J8.9wt@netcom.com> organization: hooked newsgroups: ca.environment