Article View: ca.environment
Article #7122Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
From: Jim Barrett
Date: Mon, 08 May 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 08 May 1995 00:00
98 lines
4770 bytes
4770 bytes
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: >In article <3oleq3$dbs@tuna.hooked.net> jimbar@tuna.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) >writes: > >In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: > >>Look -- if YOU want forests, YOU buy them and preserve them. > >The forests that are owned by the country are already owned > >in part by myself. These forests should be preserved. > > > >I do believe that those of us who believe that it is > >important to preserve the ecosystem should start buying the > >land. It is very clear to me that many do not think it is > >important and will resist forever any attempts to force them > >into participating in saving the planet. Many do not even > >believe that the planet is dying or that it matters even if > >it is. > >1. The planet, our planet Earth, is not alive. It can not die. It does not > live. 1. The planet may not be living in the sense that an organism is. However it is presently supporting life and may in the future not be supporting life. >2. "Preserve the ecosystem"??? What ultimate conservative nonsense. The > ecological systems of the planet are in a state of change and always will > be in a state of change. > > Of course, this is really a code phrase for "stop any and all changes by > mankind, even if 99% of the human population must die". > > What self hate some people have for themselves (and such transferrence of > that self hate to their own species). Of course, after meeting such people > I hate them too. 2. Yes. Preserve the ecosystem. It is all connected. The ecosystem is truely in a continous state of flux. There are some activities that may result in the end of it being an ecosystem. I am not in favor of stopping any and all changes made by mankind. I am only in favor of stopping those that are destructive. I certainly do not want anybody to die. We are part of the ecosystem also. I do not hate myself and I do not hate you. I think there is too much hate. I'm sorry if you think you might hate me. I'm only trying to engage in a discussion. >3. And of course, any changes by man to the ecological system are insignifcant > to what other species have done. I mean changing the atmosphere from > methane/ammonia to oxygen/CO2 ... unless you want to go back and > preserve the origibal Earth atmosphere? > >Actually, man is probably the best animal around for maintaining a fairly >unchanged ecological system in the presence of technology. Or, if ants had >nuclear weapons, all life on the planet would be dead in a week. > > I'm really just trying to avoid destroying the planet or to avoid making the planet so polluted that living on it is a horrible experience. The ecosystem is a system which involves change and flux. To preserve it in my mind means to keep it viable. To keep it from being unable to support life. If the air we breath and the water we drink continues to get more polluted and our food is covered with more and more chemicals which harm us, I think we are moving in the wrong direction. I don't think that I or our government should be allowed to "take" anything from you or force you to do anything other than force you not to harm me. I should not be allowed to steal from you nor should I be allowed to decrease the value of your land. On the other hand you should not be allowed to decrease the value of what I have. Some of the things I have include the air I breath and the forests that are owned by my country. These are my forests and I believe that I have a right to the air. I don't think that our country should give any special financial breaks to timber companies to cut down my forests. If this drives up the cost of paper then so be it. I do not wish to subsidize anyone elses newpaper. If one harms me by invading my home country or my air I think that the government should protect me. I think that the threat to my wellbeing that comes from those who are destructive to our environment is as real as the threat to my wellbeing that comes from a personal attact. There are many days when the air is not fit to breath. This is a "taking" by those who are destroying the air. I think I should be compensated.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3om6ce$een@worm.hooked.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3olm6v$sbd@hpscit.sc.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology Date: 1995/05/08 Message-ID: <3om6ce$een@worm.hooked.net> X-Deja-AN: 102344850 references: <3olm6v$sbd@hpscit.sc.hp.com> organization: hooked newsgroups: ca.environment