Article View: ca.environment
Article #7198Re: Phase II Reformulated Gasoline
From: DBRILEY
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00
6 lines
877 bytes
877 bytes
Why, if RFG is such a good idea does the ARB need to do a public relations campaign? Perhaps there are lingering concerns about RFG and its impacts on the environment. Or perhaps, there is growing resentment to the fact that many refineries have used the RFG requirements as an excse to expand their operations. In either case, I feel the ARB should spend its $ elsewhere.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3lvipv$da6@newsbf02.news.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<dhnovakD64u91.JMG@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,671b976fb83cdc39,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: dbriley@aol.com (DBRILEY) Subject: Re: Phase II Reformulated Gasoline Date: 1995/04/05 Message-ID: <3lvipv$da6@newsbf02.news.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 100093927 sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com references: <dhnovakD64u91.JMG@netcom.com> organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) reply-to: dbriley@aol.com (DBRILEY) newsgroups: ca.environment