Article View: ca.environment
Article #727Re: California Oil Production and Prop 87?
From: jswatson
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:39
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:39
76 lines
4142 bytes
4142 bytes
Thanks,
that report roughly corresponds to another I found on CA Production,
which stated:
California Oil Production
(From http://www.energy.ca.gov/oil/index.html):
"Crude oil production in California averaged 731,150 barrels per day in
2004" (0.73 millioin bbl/day)
"4.7 percent from 2003"
I did a rough calculation of CA consumption based on:
CIA WOrld Factbook:
For the USA:
Oil - consumption:
20.03 million bbl/day (2003 est.)
And
California Population: 36,132,147 (Wikipedia).
US Population: 300,327,03
Assuming Californians are use about the same about of oil as
the rest of USAians, that means :
CA Population as a percentage of US is 0.12031
Since California is 12.03% of the US Population, we can guesstimate
that California uses 12.03%
of the Oil consumed in the US, therefore about 2.41 million bbl/day.
So California uses roughly 3.3 times more oil every day than it
produces.
On Oct 11, 3:42 pm, "Chuck Whealton" <chuck_wheal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> jswat...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > I'm curious to know how many barrels of oil does California take out of
> > the earth every year?
> > And what percentage of energy does that represnet in what California
> > uses:
> > 90%?, 95%, 99%? Or more like 1%, 5%, 10%?
>
> > I'm just wondering, because Al Gore and Barbara Boxer, amoung others,
> > says that if Prop 87 passes, California will be energy independent from
>
> > foreign oil producers.
>
> > I wonder if this included Texas. Or Canada? :-)
>
> > So I'm wondering how close this is to being anywhere near the truth ...
> > or does this more show that they never saw a tax they didn't like?
>
> > If I had some feel for how much oil California produces, verses how
> > much
> > we import, it might give me a feel for how close we are to becoming
> > energy independent
> > anytime soon.
>
> > I notice that every major newspaper in CA has come out against Prop 87,
> > even the San Francisco Chronicle.
>
> > And does this "independence from foreign oil" they speak of, factor in
> > population growth
> > and the therefore increase in energy requirements of California?
>
> > Seems like that is always what they forget about in these little
> > "energy independence"
> > schemes of theirs: that California is growing by about 500,000 people
> > every year.Well, this report tells you everything you want to know about
> California oil production except (unless I missed it) what percentage
> of California's own energy needs it safisfies. I had no idea
> California produced so much oil. They rank fourth in the United States
> in production behind Louisiana, Texas, and Alaska.
>
> ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/annual_reports/2005/0101summary1_05.pdf
>
> Charles R. Whealton
> Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1160609961.893919.27360@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1160603679.948882.9890@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1160606560.042396.305610@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b4ae5d14ebac5239 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: jswatson@yahoo.com Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Re: California Oil Production and Prop 87? Date: 11 Oct 2006 16:39:21 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 77 Message-ID: <1160609961.893919.27360@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> References: <1160603679.948882.9890@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1160606560.042396.305610@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 143.232.188.159 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1160609967 8141 127.0.0.1 (11 Oct 2006 23:39:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:39:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1160606560.042396.305610@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=143.232.188.159; posting-account=RFMJXAwAAAAFsOh7QL-Sk6J2TYogBcOl