Article View: ca.environment
Article #7297Proposed Corporate Welfare Act
From: Robert Benson
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 1995 21:43
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 1995 21:43
179 lines
8047 bytes
8047 bytes
This is a draft of a possible ballot initiative on Corporate Welfare. A similar bill may be drafted for introduction in Congress. The idea is to turn the tables on the reactionaries, recast the political debate, and reclaim for progressives the leadership in the populist tide that is sweeping the country. The Purpose section of the draft borrows some phrases from the RepublicansU social welfare reform bill. Please send comments and suggested revisions ASAP. Discussion draft of 3/1/95 Comments to Robert Benson Professor of Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles (Tel. 213/736-1094. Fax 213/380-3769) AN ACT TO END CORPORATE WELFARE ABUSE The People of the State of California do enact as follows: Section 1. The Business and Professions Code, Division 7 (General Business Regulations), Part 2 (Preservation and Regulation of Competition) is amended to add a new Chapter 8, to read: Chapter 8 CORPORATE WELFARE RESPONSIBILITY ACT Section. 17400. Short Title This Act shall be known as the Corporate Welfare Responsibility Act. Section 17401. Purpose The People of the State of California find that honest and self-reliant businesses are the foundation of a successful free-market economy. The People are concerned that the extensive government handouts of taxes and other public resources to business for many purposes have become a system of corporate welfare. The People are concerned that this system is not only rewarding socially and environmentally destructive corporate behavior but is producing generations of illegitimate entrepreneurs dependent upon the public dole rather than upon their own initiative. It is the purpose of this Act to help, cajole, lure or force corporations to end their welfare dependency. It is further the purpose of this Act to recover for the People the resources that are rightfully theirs. Section 17402. CitizensU legal actions against corporate welfare abusers Any citizen of this state may bring an action in superior court against any domestic or foreign corporation doing business in California for a judicial declaration that the corporation is a welfare abuser. Section 17403. Penalties (a) Reimbursement to the public treasury. Upon a finding by the court that the corporation is a welfare abuser, the court shall order the corporation to reimburse the public treasury for the dollar value of tax and other benefits that were gained at the expense of the public because of the abuse. Interest at the rate of ten percent per year from the time the benefits accrued shall be added to the dollar value. (b) Three strikes and out of the state. Upon a finding that the corporation has been declared a welfare abuser three times by final judgments against it, the court may revoke the corporationUs privilege to do business in this state. Section 17404. Conduct constituting corporate welfare abuse The court shall find that a corporation is a welfare abuser if, after trial, clear and convincing evidence establishes that the corporation has engaged in any of the following conduct: (a) Corporate community abandonment. For purposes of this Act, Rcorporate community abandonmentS means accepting a public financial incentive to locate or expand business operations in a California community and then, at any time within seven years after accepting the incentive, causing a net loss of jobs or corporate assets at that location through transfer to a different community in or out of California. RPublic financial incentiveS means any grant, loan, loan guarantee, or bond made available by any public agency organized under state law. It also means any tax incentive authorized by any provision of state law, which, by exemption, exclusion, deduction, allowance, credit, preferential tax rate or other device, reduces the amount of tax revenues that would otherwise accrue to the public treasury. (b) Corporate free-riding on public infrastructure. For purposes of this Act, Rcorporate free-riding on public infrastructureS means paying less than the fair share of taxes for expenditures on fire and police protection, schools, roads and other public improvements. The fair share is that amount needed to cover expenditures directly attributable to the corporationUs presence. (c) Corporate looting of natural resources. For purposes of this Act, Rcorporate looting of natural resourcesS means paying less than fair market value for water, land, minerals, oil or gas sold or leased to the corporation by any public agency organized under state law. This subsection applies only to agreements entered into after the effective date of this Act. (d) Corporate taking of public property without paying just compensation. For purposes of this Act, Rcorporate taking of public property without paying just compensationS means corporate actions anywhere within the worldUs biosphere that damage the global commons without just payment. RThe global commonsS means the property that is the common heritage of all humankind and is necessary for survival of future generations, specifically, the oceans, water supplies, biodiversity of plant and animal life, topsoil, primary forests, wetlands, the atmospheric ozone layer, and the atmosphere affecting global climate change. It shall not be a defense to this Act that any of this property is in private ownership, since all of the property is declared by this Act to be subject to the public trust doctrine which does not permit its destruction even by its temporary private owners. In fashioning an equitable order for reimbursement of the public treasury under this subdivision, the court shall consider that the affected public is global and includes future generations. The court shall therefore direct reimbursement to a fund that it finds, in its discretion, will be likely to repair damage to the global commons and to benefit the broadest possible class of the affected public. To this end, the court may direct reimbursement to non- profit, non-governmental public interest organizations whose principal purposes are to halt destruction of all or part of the global commons. The court may also direct reimbursement to international funding agencies created under the authority of the United Nations Framework Convention on Biological Diversity, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (e) Subsidized corporate pushing of harmful products. For purposes of this Act, Rsubsidized corporate pushing of harmful productsS means taking a state tax deduction for advertising expenses for any of the following: guns, tobacco products, beef products, energy from nuclear, fossil-fuel or other non-renewable sources, and automobiles rated at less than 40 miles-per-gallon combined city-highway fuel efficiency by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Section 17405. Severability If any part or application of this Act is declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of law, that part or application shall be severed from the whole and the rest of the Act shall remain in effect.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<APC&1'0'4f72717b'ac0@igc.apc.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!news.igc.apc.org!cdp!rbensonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,8a93fd928e1d459e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-05 03:33:50 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!enews.sgi.com!news.igc.apc.org!cdp!rbenson From: Robert Benson <rbenson@igc.apc.org> Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Proposed Corporate Welfare Act Message-ID: <APC&1'0'4f72717b'ac0@igc.apc.org> Date: Sat, 04 Mar 1995 13:43:00 -0800 (PST) X-Gateway: notes@igc.apc.org Lines: 183