🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <UofO-1301951230070001@klamath-labs-mac21.uoregon.edu>,
dopey <UofO> wrote:
>ut: Re: 1 Calif "Wise Use" & Property v. Ecology....
>>  
>>  >  You can not back up a single squawk with facts nor logic.
>> 
>> s> Why bother?  This is as "environmental" newsgroup, facts and
>> s> logic need not apply.  It's for repeating religious mantras.
>> 
>   Facts and logic are the engine of environmentalism. Some people get the
>opposite impression because most environmental debates revolve around
>scientific issues which are way beyond the I.Q. of your born-again
>dittoheads. Real facts are a confusing thing to the type of mentality that
>thinks that pollution is caused by trees.No wonder these people think of
>environmentalism as a "religion" , to them it must really seem such!

Wow!  Such a display of hard-core facts and logic!  I'm awed, truly
I am!  A fall on my knees before such overpowering reason, knocking my
poor assertions aside like the tiny, worthless things they are.  I'VE
SEEN THE LIGHT  EPA AKBAR!  EPA AKBAR!  SALAAM!  SALAAM!
-- 
Larry Smith --- My opinions only.           larrys@zk3.dec.com/larrys@io.com.
pentagon.io.com is Illuminati OnLine, SJ Games, _not_ "the" Pentagon, please.
   Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of human freedom. It is the
   argument of the tyrant and the creed of the slave.   -- William Pitt, 1763