Article View: ca.environment
Article #73491 Calif "Wise Use" & Property v. Ecology
From: Doug Bashford
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 1994 08:21
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 1994 08:21
143 lines
8303 bytes
8303 bytes
Date: 31 Oct 94
Subj: 1993-94 Private Property Congressional Vote Index (Part I)
U> PROPERTY RIGHTS EMERGING AS MAJOR CAMPAIGN ISSUE
U> NEW INDEX RATES CONGRESS
U> "There are a wide variety of reasons why these incumbents are
U> fighting for their political lives," League of Private Property
U> Voters chairman Chuck Cushman said.
U> "All over the country, property rights is emerging as a major
U> issue. Incumbents with poor voting records on property rights face
U> defeat in November," Cushman said.
In fact, the Property Rights whackos hold views similar to
Right Wing Libertarian extremists who privately (and not so privately)
would have us abolish our National Parks and Forests. And whenever
a choice between nature and convenience is made, to side with
human convenience at all costs. "Wise Use" is primarily known
for it's extreme anti-environmental posturing and slick propaganda.
In fact, if we look at at what they are are proposing, we can see
that "private property rights" are NOT their major concern. One
would be hard pressed to say that give-aways of public land to
mining interests or rancher-welfare grazing "rights" or wanting
more money for roads in our National Forests (timber-welfare) has
much to do with the "Private property takings" scare tactics they
push in their slick propaganda to the little people they use.
What do they really want?? I don't know, if you can figure it out,
let me know. I would guess hyper-capitalism and who-cares-if-
it-trickles-down economics. That is; business supported on the
backs of the middle class. They seem infuriated that we own any
land via our public property rights (National Parks etc), and they
want to weaken our rights by giving them to the Big Boys with Money.
If they want to take away My rights in MY National Forest, they
had better come with guns, and lots of them.
U> The Private Property Congressional Vote Index for the 103rd
U> Congress tabulated fourteen key roll call votes in the House of
U> Representatives and ten in the Senate. Issues covered include the
U> National Biological Survey, [...and] designating over nine
U> million acres of new Wilderness Areas in California and Montana,
U> and other Federal land use
U> Published by the
U> LEAGUE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY VOTERS
U> Battle Ground, WA
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (1993 1994 House Votes)
CONGRESSIONAL VOTE SCORECARD 08/02/94
The votes listed below show how Congress supported (S) or opposed (O) the
League of Private Property Voters support position taken on the following
votes.
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 PERCENT
Year: 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 SUPPORT
When All
League Vote Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 Voting Votes
11 13
LEAGUE SUPPORT Position: N N Y Y N N Y N N Y Y Y Y N
California
Baker B (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Becerra X (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Beilenson A (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Berman H (D) O O O O O ? O O O O O O O O 0 0
Brown G (D) O O O O O ? ? O O O O O O O 0 0
Calvert K (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Condit G (D) S S S S O S O O O S O S S O 57 57
Cox C (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Cunningham R (R) O S S S S S O O O S S S S S 71 71
Dellums R (D) S O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Dixon J (D) S O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Dooley C (D) S S S S S O O O O S O S O O 50 50
Doolittle J (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S ? S 100 93
Dornan R (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Dreier D (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Edwards D (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Eshoo A (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Farr S (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Fazio V (D) S S S S O O O O O O O S O O 36 36
Filner B (D) S O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Gallegly E (R) O S S S S S S O ? S S S S S 85 79
Hamburg D (D) S O O O O O O O S ? O O O O 15 14
Harman J (D) O O O O O O O O O O O S O O 7 7
Herger W (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Horn S (R) O O S S O ? O O O S S S O O 38 36
Huffington M (R) S S S S S S S O S S ? S S S 92 86
Hunter D (R) S S ? S S S S S S S S S S S 100 93
Kim J (R) O O S S O S S S S S S S S S 79 79
Lantos T (D) O O O S O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Lehman R (D) S S S S S ? O O O O O S O O 46 43
Lewis J (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Martinez M (D) S O O S O O O ? O O O S O O 23 21
Matsui R (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O ? 0 0
McCandless A (R) O S S S S S S S S S S S S S 93 93
McKeon H (R) O S S S S S S S S S S S S S 93 93
Miller G (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Mineta N (D) S O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Moorhead C (R) O S S S S S S O S S S S S S 86 86
Packard R (R) S S S S S S S S S ? S S S S 100 93
Pelosi N (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Pombo R (R) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 100
Rohrabacher D (R) O O S S O S S S S S S S S S 79 79
Roybal Allard L (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Royce E (R) S O S S O S S S S ? S S S S 85 79
Schenk L (D) O O O S O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Stark P (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Thomas B (R) S S S S S S S S S S O S S S 93 93
Torres E (D) O O O O O O O O O S O O O O 7 7
Tucker W (D) S O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 7
Waters M (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Waxman H (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Woolsey L (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Connecticut
DeLauro R (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Franks G (R) O O S S O O O O O O O S O O 21 21
Gejdenson S (D) O O O O O O O O O ? O O O O 0 0
Johnson N (R) O O O S O O S O O S O S O O 29 29
Kennelly B (D) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
Shays C (R) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0
U> House Vote #1: Forest Service Multiple Use Roads
U> Appropriations bill that would cut $11.9 million from the Forest
U> Service road budget. A no was the private property rights vote.
cont. in next... (if you want another state's breakdown, let me know.)
... You may be an idiot, but try not to be stupid. -- Forest Gump
AddSig
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<86e_9412031504@salata.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcomsv!netcomsv!salata!ow!doug.bashfordShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102cad,66f75b0cac189d57,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102cad,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,66f75b0cac189d57,start X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,66f75b0cac189d57,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,66f75b0cac189d57,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-03 16:43:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcomsv!netcomsv!salata!ow!doug.bashford From: Doug.Bashford%ow@salata.com (Doug Bashford) Date: 27 Nov 94 08:21:32 Subject: 1 Calif "Wise Use" & Property v. Ecology Message-ID: <86e_9412031504@salata.com> Organization: Fidonet: ONE WORLD Los Angeles 310-372-0987 Newsgroups: ca.environment,talk.environment,ca.politics,alt.org.earth-first Lines: 143