Article View: ca.environment
Article #7544Re: Disaster! (was Cal Desert Bill passes!)
From: Eric Mankin
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 23:55
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 23:55
43 lines
2983 bytes
2983 bytes
In article <37uou3$b0t@crl.crl.com> ourston@crl.com (Todd Ourston) writes: >Eric Mankin (mankin@mizar.usc.edu) wrote: #: Were you really never told to clean up after yourself? #: Is the concept, "pay for what you break" really complicated? #: When you use a public toilet, do you just dump on the floor #: Do you really think there is something selfish about someone objecting #: to have to deal with someone else's mess? # #No, no, no, and maybe. But what does this have to do with a policy that #makes no accomodation of historic uses of the land in question, despite #the fact that a sizeable number of citizens wish to continue such use and #may actually be willing and able to fund mitigation and preventative #measures that address the sort of damage you are implying? Then there's a chance to reopen the issue on a case-by-case, trail by trail basis after the principle is established that the land is a public trust and something worth preserving. #Above, you have shifted the issues a bit. You did not introduce the #notion of impact compensation before now, nor has that concept been #featured in prior discussions of the propriety of the California Desert #bill, so I clearly was not responding to that. What I was responding to #was your suggestion that motorized uses of all trails in the Mojave or #Death Valley should be banned and displaced to other areas, without any #objective analysis to support that edict or show why it should not apply #to some or all non-motorized uses as well. # #: *oops -- forgot you don't do it. Substitute "someone" # #But don't substitute one issue for another, huh? Fair enough. I wasn't aware that there was any move to end public use of non-paved roads & jeep tracks in Death Valley or Joshua Tree, or that the eastablishment of the EM monument meant a total end to vehicular access. As I understand it, part will be wilderness, part won't. When people talk about ORV use, what I visualize is not jeeps going down jeep trails -- which I use, in my own juicecan jeep -- but hordes of motorized vandals in four wheel hondas zipping over unbroken terrain. I am emphatically not in favor of closing all jeep trails on public land -- and I don't believe that is what the Desert bill does. Eric Mankin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37v2tb$a45@mizar.usc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!usc!not-for-mailReferences:
<37p9uk$nn4@crl6.crl.com> <37ui7i$hfg@mizar.usc.edu> <37uou3$b0t@crl.crl.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,92400604b160c5bc X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-17 16:55:23 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!usc!not-for-mail From: mankin@mizar.usc.edu (Eric Mankin) Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Re: Disaster! (was Cal Desert Bill passes!) Date: 17 Oct 1994 16:55:23 -0700 Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 45 Sender: mankin@mizar.usc.edu Message-ID: <37v2tb$a45@mizar.usc.edu> References: <37p9uk$nn4@crl6.crl.com> <37ui7i$hfg@mizar.usc.edu> <37uou3$b0t@crl.crl.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu