Article View: ca.environment
Article #763Re: Offending The 'Fat'. Excuse me, I Mean 'Obese'.
From: johnwesley55
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:48
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:48
132 lines
6965 bytes
6965 bytes
youngopinions@aol.com wrote: > Amazing, the interesting articles one reads while surfing the web. > > > > > > http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/04/04/122448.php > > > > by Andy Marsh > > > > I've been reading a lot of stories lately about obesity and how the > rest of the world is picking on fat people. Poor babies! > > > Look, I understand that in some instances obesity can't be helped. I > also don't believe that the majority of obese people fit into the > category of "it can't be helped." I just don't get it. I mean, I'm not > very active. I eat bullshit snack foods all the time; it's called the > munchies. I don't exercise very much. Ok, I play golf, so I don't > really exercise at all. I even have an electric bicycle. Even with all > these things going against me, I'm still only a few pounds overweight! > How the hell do you get to the stage they call obese? > > > When I looked up obesity on Wikipedia, it told me that this "disease" > is very rare in wild animals and pretty common in domesticated animals. > The reason? Domestic animals tend to be overfed and under exercised. In > other words, if obesity is a problem, try eating less and exercising > more. Sounds pretty simple to me. > > > A couple of weeks ago at BC, I read an article about fat people having > trouble getting hired. The way I read the article and the comments that > went along with it, the writer got on his tilt because his mother told > him that fat people couldn't get hired for good jobs. Of course, the > discussion that followed brought up smoking and every other thing that > employers should be using as hiring criteria, but really didn't discuss > the problem of hiring the obese and the associated costs. > > > Today I opened the editorial section of my paper, like I do every day, > and read a letter from someone whining because their feelings were hurt > over a picture in the paper last week showing two therapists sitting in > one oversized wheelchair. The person that wrote the article whined > because it sent a negative message. What was the message, you ask? > According to the letter to the editor, the message is that two normal > sized people can fit in the same space as one fat person. Somehow the > person that wrote that letter doesn't realize that I don't need a > picture to figure out that two of me can fit where one of her can fit. > I usually get the picture when he/she walks by my table at Quizno's and > blocks out the sun for a minute or two. > > > Why is calling attention to the obvious politically incorrect? Why is > saying things like, "You should have to pay for two seats on the > airplane if your ass takes up two seats," a bad thing? I've noticed > those wide-load wheelchairs at the airport too. You know what that > means to me? It means that some poor sorry bastard (possibly me) is > gonna get cheated out of half his seat on the plane because someone > else needs two and a half seats. I'd bet that if they just showed a > picture of that wheel chair without anyone in it, none of us would have > known that the thing was designed for someone with an ass two axe > handles wide. Maybe they should have just put a really, really big > person in it instead. Then all the fat folks wouldn't be offended by > it. I'd think they'd be more offended by the normal sized wheel chair, > saying things like, "Why do they make these chairs so small?" or "Don't > they know that us 'normal' sized people can't fit in those child > seats?" > > > Maybe it's not the big seat that's really offensive. Maybe it's the > little seats that are offensive. Think about it for a minute. If > medical supply companies knew the size of Americans, they'd naturally > make bigger chairs to accommodate all the fat asses in this country. > > > The person whining in the paper asks, "Would you similarly insult a > gay-lesbian group in a photo?" Maybe they were really trying to! Maybe > the two therapists shown in the picture were lesbians? But they were > skinny lesbians! > > > I'm here to say that from now on, PC is forever BS! No more PC BS. > Ever! We're gonna call fat people fat, lazy people lazy, stupid people > stupid. We're gonna include religious whackos and secular shitheads in > this group too. When we do this, there will be no return name-calling, > no playing the race card or the PC card anymore. The PC card has been > removed from the deck and has been burned at the stake. > > > I usually try to be a nice guy. I've tried to learn that thing they > call tact over the years. I'm getting better at it, but it still really > kicks my ass sometimes. I mean, I've never made a comment to anyone in > front of me at Burger King that ordered two Whoppers and a diet coke. > I've never made a comment when I heard one woman ask another, "Does > this make me look fat?" I have made a comment if I've been asked myself > (yes it hurt), but never to anyone I didn't know. I yell through my car > window at idiot drivers. Sometimes I even roll the window down. But, > for the most part, I try to behave. It's just sometimes I get so tired > of listening to anyone other than me whine, it just drives me crazy! > I'm here to tell you, I have some comments to make, too. We need a special tax on these blubber butts! John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > ---------- > > J Young > youngopinions@aol.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1144698526.904239.200670@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<6_GdneUNd6Tqb6TZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@giganews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,9cc9cbc5a7aeef3d,start X-Google-Thread: 114271,9cc9cbc5a7aeef3d,start X-Google-Thread: 1086ba,9cc9cbc5a7aeef3d,start X-Google-Thread: f765b,9cc9cbc5a7aeef3d,start X-Google-Thread: 1037c2,9cc9cbc5a7aeef3d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,gid114271,gid1086ba,gidf765b,gid1037c2,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: johnwesley55@lycos.com Newsgroups: ca.environment,rec.backcountry,rec.equestrian,mn.general,neworleans.general Subject: Re: Offending The 'Fat'. Excuse me, I Mean 'Obese'. Date: 10 Apr 2006 12:48:46 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 133 Message-ID: <1144698526.904239.200670@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <6_GdneUNd6Tqb6TZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@giganews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.42.86.132 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1144698532 17435 127.0.0.1 (10 Apr 2006 19:48:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:48:52 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <6_GdneUNd6Tqb6TZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@giganews.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.42.86.132; posting-account=4mykOw0AAAAdW7jCx-TkwPfDRu97TUm0