Article View: ca.environment
Article #7726Re: Oil Companies
From: Gregory Brian Pasternack
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 1994 01:24
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 1994 01:24
44 lines
3073 bytes
3073 bytes
Mitchell Craig (hcrms@venus.chvpkh.chevron.com) wrote: : >I think that if there are specific cases where harm is done, and a : >company refuses to try to help the victim or mitigate the damage, then : >legal action may be in order. However, what you [gary hammell] have : >described, : >> "if a company knowingly produces and promotes a substance or : >> product which is in anyway harmful to the biosphere, it would be : >> punished..." : >sounds more like you are fundamentally opposed to companies that do : >certain kinds of business. You don't leave much room for most of the : >industries in the world. If you were to sue all industries that : >pollute, you would be in court a long time. I think we all have better : >things to do, fix and create. I must say that I agree with Mitchell on this point. In fact, almost everything we do in life creates undesirable by-products. Given the population of some urban areas, the environment is simply not capable of dealing with just the material we sneeze (for example) let alone all the junk our technologies produce! Still, I feel that Gary makes a useful point in suggesting that business should be fostered around a kind of "disposal side" economics instead of "supply side" economics. That is, if there is no way to recycle/re-use the left over components of a product, then it should not be made in the first place. : >Isn't it the responsibility of county, municipal, state, and : >federal government, and developers to provide better mass transit and : >bike trails. We need to encourage and support this type of action. : >And finally, isn't it the responsibility of the people : >to ride their bikes to work and use public transit instead of driving? Here too i agree with Mitchell. Certainly oil companies have a lot of work to do in improving their refinery techniques (e.g. removing selenium from waste water!), but there is plenty of room for each and every one of us to alleviate the problem by choosing public transportation or, even better, living within walking/biking distance of our places of business/academia. -- Greg Pasternack | Because each and every reality needs Environmental Scientist | a regular tune up. gpast@uclink.berkeley.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2to9l7$9s2@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!uclink.berkeley.edu!gpastReferences:
<1994Jun05.134117.29637@rose.com> <Cr1Mtu.DI6@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1994Jun10.025551.29103@nntpserver.chevron.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,6e6bbf73224de7f3 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-16 14:30:51 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!uclink.berkeley.edu!gpast From: gpast@uclink.berkeley.edu (Gregory Brian Pasternack) Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Re: Oil Companies Date: 16 Jun 1994 01:24:55 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 44 Distribution: ca Message-ID: <2to9l7$9s2@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <1994Jun05.134117.29637@rose.com> <Cr1Mtu.DI6@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1994Jun10.025551.29103@nntpserver.chevron.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: uclink.berkeley.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]