Article View: ca.environment
Article #7738Re: A response to Stan Olochwoszcz
From: tele1
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 17:40
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 17:40
51 lines
3146 bytes
3146 bytes
Just wanted to poke my nose in... While I agree with your plan in principle, one thing you need to realize is that it won't happen any time soon. What you propose is a massive undertaking; an almost complete retooling of an economy. Oil and gas undeniably make up a major portion of the world's economy. To have a major player suddenly change its energy consumption method would have drastic and unfortunate effects upon economic and political stability. I'm not advocating remaining on a fossil-fuel footing, but merely taking a pragmatic view. The world's oil companies are not interested in changing their product because it is a safe sell, and billions of dollars has been poured into the mechanics of producing and delivering it to consumers. To suggest to them that they destroy it all and rebuild it to accomodate another raw material would, at this point in time, get quite a few doors slammed in your face. Eventually, something like this MUST take place, as consumption greatly outpaces production of the raw material (Earth don't do instant gratification...). I would also bet a buck on the fact that a plan such as yours has been carefully and completely researched and designed by the big oil companies, ready to be implemented at such a time as it becomes absolutely critical, like, when they run out of raw material. The only way to implement this change before then is to manipulate the free market system. I am reminded of the passage from Orwell's "1984" in which the hero ponders the "Proles", noticing that they have the power to control their own destinies, but they just aren't aware of it. We, as consumers, are free market proletariats, but we have the power to "control the means of production" (does this mean *I* am a commie, too??). To do this, we must merely put our dollars in the right places. This means buying "appliances" that run on all or mostly ethanol fuels (just to illustrate your point). If enough of the consuming public does this, it will force the issue: You can't make a buck selling widgets if nobody's buying... But hey, without folks trying things, nothing would happen. Press on with your research; it's truly a worthy cause. -- Eric N. Valor tele1@eternity.corp.sgi.com paladin@darkside.com - This Space Intentionally Left Blank -
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Crwx3t.AGE@odin.corp.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!get.hooked.net!decwrl!ames!lll-winken.llnl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.hal.COM!olivea!sgigate.sgi.com!odin!eternity.corp.sgi.com!tele1References:
<Jun.23.11.42.29.1994.7749@skate.rutgers.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,c806129a8cf0ec3e X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-24 16:41:13 PST Newsgroups: ca.environment Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!get.hooked.net!decwrl!ames!lll-winken.llnl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.hal.COM!olivea!sgigate.sgi.com!odin!eternity.corp.sgi.com!tele1 From: tele1@eternity.corp.sgi.com () Subject: Re: A response to Stan Olochwoszcz Message-ID: <Crwx3t.AGE@odin.corp.sgi.com> Sender: news@odin.corp.sgi.com (Net News) Nntp-Posting-Host: eternity.corp.sgi.com Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. References: <Jun.23.11.42.29.1994.7749@skate.rutgers.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Fri, 24 Jun 1994 17:40:39 GMT Lines: 52