🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2vmn7l$10d@crl2.crl.com>, ourston@crl.com (Todd Ourston)
writes:

You are obviously given to making sweeping assumptions about one's
education and understanding of issues and stating them as fact--without a
single supporting quote, I might add.  Please refrain from such behavior
in the future.  It borders on a personal attack.  If you disagree with
something I have written, then please explain.  If you don't understand
something I have written, ask. 

Gee, Todd- My assumptions about your position was in response to your
anti-environmental tone in your response to the question of More trails v
Habitat.  In addition, some might find your condoning statements about
clearcutting of forests (" ..clearcutting prevents forest fires..") as an
attempt to get such inflammatory responses as mine.  

Please take the time to be intelligent while writing in this forum if you
wish to be treated intelligently.  Environmental issues and trail access
issues are personal to me because I see people taking sides which create a
gap which is not needed if we are to have both environmental  protection
for critical habitat and a place to re-create ourselves (a.k.a.
recreation).  We are not playing on equal grounds with regard to human
population (and the need for rec.) versus ecological needs-- we are
directly at odds at this time.