Article View: ca.environment
Article #7822Re: Wanted: Fact and opinion on AQMD's RECLAIM
From: Sheryl Katz
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 20:25
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 20:25
40 lines
2774 bytes
2774 bytes
> >My name is Kevin Hsieh and I'm a Biology/Public Policy Analysis major at Pomona >College. I'm researching the South Coast Air Quality Management District's >(SCAQMD or just AQMD) Regional Clean Air Incentives Market program (RECLAIM). >I'm looking for _INFORMED_ fact and opinion regarding this new program. >Comments from businesses, environmentalists, politicians, and concerned >citizens is welcome. Just to jog your memory, RECLAIM is a new program that >started Jan. 1 designed to reduce NOX and sulfur oxides through market >incentives. If I describe the program any more, I'm less likely to get >informed opinion. Sorry. :-( > Kevin, You will find that SCAQMD has taken a considerable amount of public comment on RECLAIM, all of which is on the public record. I suggest that you go to Diamond Bar and read the administrative record of the rulemaking. I practice environmental law in LA. Here is what I think of RECLAIM: 1. A noble effort. Too many times environmental programs are merely tinkered with when they need to be entirely reconsidered. I applaud the effort. 2. The monitoring and recordkeeping provisions are too burdensome for doing business in the real world. 3. Application of the program is unfair. Some businesses which were built to comply with NSPS have little to nothing they can do to reduce emissions past current levels. 4. Too driven by theory and ideology. Who really thinks that using the "marketplace" as a metaphor for controlling emissions is meaningful except for libertarians and conservative idealogues. 5. It has diverted too many resources from the challenge at hand. SCAQMD has major challenges facing it in meeting mandated deadlines. RECLAIM has sucked too many resources into an experimental effort. -- Sherry Katz - slkatz@netcom.com Graham & James Los Angeles, CA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slkatzCo43Ds.JMH@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!amdahl!netcomsv!netcom.com!slkatzReferences:
<1994Apr10.062657.1@pitvax.pitzer.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,f3adb4d757cc88f4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-Thread: 10607c,f3adb4d757cc88f4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10607c,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,f3adb4d757cc88f4 X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-04-11 13:25:04 PST Newsgroups: ca.environment,ca.politics,sci.environment Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!amdahl!netcomsv!netcom.com!slkatz From: slkatz@netcom.com (Sheryl Katz) Subject: Re: Wanted: Fact and opinion on AQMD's RECLAIM Message-ID: <slkatzCo43Ds.JMH@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <1994Apr10.062657.1@pitvax.pitzer.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 20:25:04 GMT Lines: 40