🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <F6SdnSqv29tFU8LenZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
 "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net> wrote:

> "Scott en Aztl�n" <scottenaztlan@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote in message 
> news:uisul1ppno8kut3retao5a3kbhld98175o@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:48:36 -0700, "Jack May" <jack.may@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> 
> >>The number of people in California is determined largely by the number of
> >>jobs that are created in California.   You could drive most jobs out of
> >>California by a law requiring people to use public transit to commute to 
> >>and
> >>from work.
> >
> > I would *love* such a law! ;)
> 
> The job loss would be by companies moving out of state.  With employees 
> taking two or three hours to get to work and repeating that time going home, 
> their productivity would be so low that companies would have to relocate to 
> where there are sane, rational laws.
> 
> Your job would most likely also go away with the collapse of the California 
> economy.   You might still be able to get a job as a farm worker along side 
> all the illegal immigrants where you would dreams of making a minimum wage 
> some day.
> 
> You must remember that your jerk off fantasy of 19th century transportation 
> will probably result in the reality of doing terrible 19th century labor. 

One need only look at HQ relocations of major corporations from 
California to see the clear and obvious trend.  Oh and part of the 
reason there is a trend?  The idiots who have the power to do something 
are in absolute complete denial unparalleled in modern history.  Royal 
France is the closest thing that come to mind:

   ..."a report released today by PPIC, the fiercely nonpartisan Public 
Policy Institute of California, points out, the exodus never happened - 
or happened in such tiny numbers that it was insignificant."