🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2mqh8d$adm@gap.cco.caltech.edu>,
Carl J Lydick <carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU> wrote:
>In article <1994Mar23.154302.13592@pbhye.PacBell.COM>, mjvande@pbhye.PacBell.COM (Mike Vandeman) writes:
>=One would think that humans could build a receiver capable of detecting safe
>=levels of sound and filtering out the noise, enough for this experiment.
>=Even if it is only annoying to wildlife, we don't have the right to do it.
>=Besides, I think it is prohibited by the Endangered Species Act.
>
>One would think that at least once in his life Mike would be able to
>demonstrate that he knows what he's talking about.  Mike, before posting more
>bullshit, learn a bit about signal processing, and elementary physics, OK? 
>We're talking about a signal that's to be received thousands of miles away. 
>Now, I know that such things as attenuation, phase dispersion, signal/noise
>ratio and so forth aren't taught in kindergarten, so perhaps you've got an
>excuse for your ignorance.  
A feasability study was done several years ago and it works.
The experiment has to be repeated now and then (but every four hours???)
to measure temperature changes over time.