Petition to CEQ

Article View: ca.environment

Article #7977

#7977

From: Paul Burnett
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1993 10:35

9 lines
984 bytes

TO: xena@crl.com

SC>      2. That an Environmental Impact Statement must always be
  >prepared, even if there is no significant environmental impact

This certainly exemplifies your anti-development Luddite views.
---
 . QMPro 1.0 41-8688 . ...from San Jose, CA

Technical Details

Message-ID: <141.31.uupcb@pcs.sj.ca.us>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!pcs!paul.burnett

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,98d3d0077ddc5783
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-07 02:35:00 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!pcs!paul.burnett
From: paul.burnett@pcs.sj.ca.us (Paul Burnett) 
Newsgroups: ca.environment
Subject: Petition to CEQ
Message-ID: <141.31.uupcb@pcs.sj.ca.us>
Date: 7 Feb 93 10:35:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: PCS-BBS - San Jose, CA - 408-270-4085
Reply-To: paul.burnett@pcs.sj.ca.us (Paul Burnett) 
Lines: 9