Article View: ca.environment
Article #8030Re: "Ecofascists" In Action
From: Michael P. Anderson
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 02:10
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 02:10
56 lines
3201 bytes
3201 bytes
In article <Buv3CJ.Kyu@quake.sylmar.ca.us> brian@quake.sylmar.ca.us (Brian K. Yoder) writes: >You mean, some environmentalists do't like the fact that the government won't >disenfranchise businessmen. It is an insult to be told by a bunch of >busybodies what one may or may not do with one's property. Much more of an >insult than being told that you will not be allowed to control the property of >someone else. OK Brian, we're going to go through this one more time. Here's the deal: Let's say property owner A cuts down all his trees. Property owner B, who lives downstream of A, finds out that the extra silt in the water has killed all the fish that he needs to feed his family. Before the cut, B would most likely protest the logging. He would say, "hey, that cut's gonna screw up the stream going through my property." Property owner A would say, "hey, I bought this property for the logs. If you keep me from cutting, that is "taking;" compensate me fairly like it says you have to in the Constitution." Owner B says. "yeah, but killing all the fish is "taking" my property; compensate me fairly likes it says you have to in the Constitution." And on and on we go with the same merry-go-round of disagreement. Right now in my neck of the woods the developers are whining that the slow-growth initiatives are "taking" their property which they bought to they could build lots of houses and make buckets of money. What do they say when I tell them that their developments will "take" my property, which I bought with the understanding that I wouldn't have a zillion people driving down my street? "Go pound sand, Mike," that's what they say. P.S. I don't understand your use of the word "insult" in the above. >What would you consider to be "working"? The elimination of all logging? >Mining? Private property? Factories? How much is enough? 1) The elimination of all logging? No. Let's negotiate... 2) The elimination of all mining? No. Let's negotiate... 3) The elimination of all private property? What, are you nuts? 4) The elimination of all factories?? Methinks you took too many hyperbole pills... How much is enough? I'll tell you. As much as it takes to bring back the salmon runs, stop the extinctions, cut greenhouse gas production, and bring the western world to a closer, symbiotic, relationship with the earth. That's how much. And guess what? All that, and you'll still have a job. Imagine that... MPA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5292@gold.gvg.tek.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!ucdavis!gvgpsa!gold.gvg.tek.com!zorba!mikeaReferences:
<1992Sep16.192625.9399@oracle.us.oracle.com> <1992Sep17.115730.1@mdcbbs.com> <Buv3CJ.Kyu@quake.sylmar.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,e1f0eb03b1cfaf52 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-09-25 14:03:06 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!ucdavis!gvgpsa!gold.gvg.tek.com!zorba!mikea From: mikea@zorba.gvg.tek.com (Michael P. Anderson) Newsgroups: ca.environment Subject: Re: "Ecofascists" In Action Message-ID: <5292@gold.gvg.tek.com> Date: 26 Sep 92 02:10:34 GMT References: <1992Sep16.192625.9399@oracle.us.oracle.com> <1992Sep17.115730.1@mdcbbs.com> <Buv3CJ.Kyu@quake.sylmar.ca.us> Sender: news@gold.gvg.tek.com Organization: Grass Valley Group, Grass Valley, CA Lines: 56