🚀 go-pugleaf

References: <l2jhouINNpft@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM>

jdr@starflight.Corp.Sun.COM (Jon Roland) blurts:
->
-> We need to make a major push on the media and politicians that there
-> is a third position distinct from pro-life and pro-choice, which
-> holds that:
-> (1) The state has a natural right to regulate the reproductive
-> behavior of its citizens, and may, under certain circumstances, need
-> to either compel women to bear children or to refrain from doing so.
-> Therefore, women must not be accorde a constitutional right to choose
-> whether or not to bear children.

Over my dead body, and, I suspect, a quite large number of other bodies,
including yours.

If the course of action you suggest ever becomes a real threat, I
believe that the population will be reduced somewhat, although not by
the Orwellian means you propose.  Fortunately, these ideas are so
ill-conceived that no one who can do anything to implement them will
ever take them seriously - at least, I hope that this is the case.

I'd rather be dead, and take the planet with me, than live under a
society such as you propose.

mIkE
----
alternate: mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us