🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.environment
Article #8152

Re: Distance to work (was "...sprawl...")

#8152
From: Carl Gooch
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1992 22:24
38 lines
2526 bytes
In article <36442@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, fuzzface@cats.ucsc.edu (Aaron Priven) writes:
|> 
|> In article <1992Jun3.215223.20957@adobe.com> jciccare@adobe.com (John Ciccarelli) writes:
|> >the US trade deficit will be better for it.
|> 
|> Really?  I don't know much (if anything) about bicycle manufacturers,
|> but somehow I got the impression they were foreign-made like most
|> computer goods.  They have names like "Schwinn" and "Huffy," but that
|> doesn't mean much nowadays when (to use a car example, sorry) Hondas
|> are certified as American-made and some Fords are made in Japan and
|> Korea (I think).
|> 
|> I am totally off-base here and I would appreciate being set straight.
|> :) :) :)

Okay, since you asked... :-)  

The average cost of a new car is what, about $10000?  Average use probably
runs about 100000 miles or so over 10 years.  (Including second+ owners.)
That's about $1000/year in purchase cost.

The average cost of a new bike which would be serviceable for the 
hypothetical 6-mile commute with which this discussion began is somewhere 
in the vicinity of $500-$600 dollars.  The lifetime of that bike is 
certain to be over 25000 miles unless it gets crashed severely, which
means 3-5+ years, even with heavy use.  Worst case (including lots of
recreational riding) that bike will still work out to less than $200/year
in purchase cost.

Any other trade deficit questions? :-)

Carl

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Gooch                       |        Why am I inside at a keyboard when 
gooch@leland.stanford.edu        |        I could be outside riding bike?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jun5.222422.10699@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!leland.Stanford.EDU!gooch
References: <JYM.92Jun2213217@remarque.berkeley.edu> <SLAGLE.92Jun3001118@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com> <1992Jun3.215223.20957@adobe.com> <36442@darkstar.ucsc.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,32d0223205c36d8d
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-05 10:29:10 PST
Newsgroups: ca.environment
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!leland.Stanford.EDU!gooch
From: gooch@leland.Stanford.EDU (Carl Gooch)
Subject: Re: Distance to work (was "...sprawl...")
Message-ID: <1992Jun5.222422.10699@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
References: <JYM.92Jun2213217@remarque.berkeley.edu> <SLAGLE.92Jun3001118@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com> <1992Jun3.215223.20957@adobe.com> <36442@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
Distribution: ca
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 92 22:24:22 GMT
Lines: 40