Re: Non-nicad rechargeables

Article View: ca.environment

Article #8270

#8270

From: Peter Kaminski
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1992 02:55

7 lines
902 bytes

In <1992Jan21.004029.2759kaminski@netcom.COM> I wrote:

>lead, mercury, or lithium; two or three times the capacity of nicads
>(though 2/3 the running time); much longer lifetime; no memory.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Should be "2/3 as long per charge as an *alkaline*."  Sorry!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jan21.025515.29568kaminski@netcom.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!netcomsv!kaminski

References: <knmjgvINNohi@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1992Jan21.004029.2759kaminski@netcom.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,8a6158f9fddefceb
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-20 19:56:30 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!netcomsv!kaminski
From: kaminski@netcom.COM (Peter Kaminski)
Newsgroups: ca.environment
Subject: Re: Non-nicad rechargeables
Message-ID: <1992Jan21.025515.29568kaminski@netcom.COM>
Date: 21 Jan 92 02:55:15 GMT
References: <knmjgvINNohi@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1992Jan21.004029.2759kaminski@netcom.COM>
Distribution: ca
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message