Article View: ca.environment
Article #96Re: Rights for Rocks!
From: Alan McGowen
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 04:08
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 04:08
20 lines
1335 bytes
1335 bytes
I have to agree with Eugene Miya (and with Roderick Nash) that we have in fact already granted some rights to nature via the legislative process. These of course are not the capital-R, Inalienable sorts of Rights which some believe they can intuit out of this or that self-evident metaphysical foundation... just plain old legal rights that affect how court decisions turn. But the argument I was addressing in this post is not answered merely by observing with Nash that as a matter of historical fact rights are expanding: -- since it asks whether the historical process, even if real, has any rational basis. My purpose was to show that there are good reasons for extending rights (small-r) to ecosystems and that this is not just a kind of bandwagon we ought to jump onto for no better reason than to join the crowd. ------------ Alan McGowen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1332900112@igc.apc.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sgi!cdp!alanmReferences:
<38511048@hpindda.cup.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sgi!cdp!alanm From: Alan McGowen <alanm@igc.apc.org> Newsgroups: ca.environment Date: 09 Oct 92 21:08 PDT Subject: Re: Rights for Rocks! Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@igc.apc.org> Message-ID: <1332900112@igc.apc.org> References: <38511048@hpindda.cup.hp.com> Nf-ID: #R:hpindda.cup.hp.com:38511048:cdp:1332900112:000:868 Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!alanm Oct 9 21:08:00 1992 Lines: 22