🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.environment
Article #997

Re: Indian v Western Civilization: Are we stupid, or what?

#997
From: Laurie
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:55
58 lines
4120 bytes
Gatos Loco <gatosloco@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<dnr9l0dpgt1njio2bj2ir5ddbto5mumqnr@4ax.com>...
> On 22 Sep 2004 23:36:38 -0700, christocbd@aol.com (fencingsax) wrote:
> 
> >nolionnoproblem@hotmail.com (DonQuijote1954) wrote in message news:<4e4a3f58.0409221037.78a9be41@posting.google.com>...
> >> > > The Indians knew how to live with the land, and we beat them, and then
> >> > > beat Nature, and finally we will beat ourselves to death. Hey,
> >> > > hallelujah!!!
> >> > >
> >> >   Actually they were very hard on the land.  Slash and burn agriculture is
> >> > not sustainable.
> >> 
> >> They may have been ignorant, but not stupid the way we are, that,
> >> knowingly, shit where we sleep. Even cats and dogs are not that
> >> stupid.
> >> 
> >> Hey, but you have to "survive" somehow in the jungle, and also keeping
> >> up with the Joneses is no small matter, right?
> >> 
> >> http://committed.to/justiceforpeace
> >
> >They weren't stupid, they just didn't need technology.
> 
> Even without "technology" they managed to hunt several species to
> extinction. And contrary to the belief that  they just lived in peace
> and harmony... They also fought amongst themselves quite a bit. In
> fact many of these tribal disputes continue today, now they take the
> form of land disputes and such.  Which then makes a convinient excuse
> for the gov to settle such disputes by land confiscation.
> 
> Probably did less damage because they didn't have any real beasts of
> burden until horses were introduced. Whith the exception of lamas of
> course. And there weapons were simple. Military campaigns aren't as
> easy when you have to walk and carry all of your goods with you.
> 
> The Aztecs enslaved many members of small tribes. Which then prompted
> many of these tribes to fight alongside the spanish when they
> destroyed there empire.
> 
> When you look at the fact the most of the rest of humanity on the
> globe was exposed to each other for such a long time the transfer of
> technology between these people was vast. Mostly the chinese invented
> everything and then a lot of europeans took credit for inventing it.  
> 
> Indians had a lot of calender technology. As well as other means of
> survival. Saying they were ignorant is kind of pointless though.
> Unfamiliar with EuroAsian cultures perhaps. But they managed to create
> somewhat complex societies.  
>  
> They werent just innocent peaceful beings though.
> But if you feel better believing it was all a peace and harmony thing,
> and that prompts you to live more peacefully don't let me stop you.
> You are probably better off that way. 
> 
> Cheers
> Gato Loco

The Indians were far from ignorant.  We may look at their society as
being complex but that's just because we're spoiled.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <b2d92064.0409250755.17b8b517@posting.google.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
References: <4e4a3f58.0408201120.61676c08@posting.google.com> <4e4a3f58.0409190643.33539400@posting.google.com> <4e4a3f58.0409221037.78a9be41@posting.google.com> <c1aaf5a4.0409222236.5c037938@posting.google.com> <dnr9l0dpgt1njio2bj2ir5ddbto5mumqnr@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10df74,61f852a0a7d25340
X-Google-Thread: fd92c,61f852a0a7d25340
X-Google-Thread: fb58e,61f852a0a7d25340
X-Google-Thread: 10607c,61f852a0a7d25340
X-Google-Thread: 110a63,61f852a0a7d25340
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,gidfd92c,gidfb58e,gid10607c,gid110a63,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: blsepe@yahoo.com (Laurie)
Newsgroups: ca.environment,uk.environment,talk.environment,sci.environment,alt.politics.greens
Subject: Re: Indian v Western Civilization: Are we stupid, or what?
Date: 25 Sep 2004 08:55:04 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <b2d92064.0409250755.17b8b517@posting.google.com>
References: <4e4a3f58.0408201120.61676c08@posting.google.com> <4e4a3f58.0409190643.33539400@posting.google.com> <4e4a3f58.0409221037.78a9be41@posting.google.com> <c1aaf5a4.0409222236.5c037938@posting.google.com> <dnr9l0dpgt1njio2bj2ir5ddbto5mumqnr@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.33.32.178
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1096127704 2889 127.0.0.1 (25 Sep 2004 15:55:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:55:04 +0000 (UTC)