Article View: ca.environment
Article #7034Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology
From: Jim Barrett
Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 00:00
28 lines
1595 bytes
1595 bytes
In ca.politics phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) said: > >Rice in Japan is around 15 times MORE expensive to produce than in America. I >can buy 10 kilos of rice and FEDEX it to Japan and it would still be much much >cheaper. > This is true. The point I'm trying to make is that the economy is distorted to not really value the components of products the way it should be. This example is perhaps one of the best. Much of the rice that is grown in California is done with substantial subsidies by the government. The water to grow it is sold to them at far below the market value. We could not grow rice in this state at the rate we do if it were not for this. Secondly rice growing in Japan is subjected to much govermnent control. Actually I don't think you can sell rice in Japan (maybe they have changed that and I am wrong). It seems obvious that there is something wrong with a system that allows one to expend all of the energy to ship it across the planet and grow it using diverted water and still come to the conclusion that it is cheaper. If we were to eliminate the government intervention I think we would see a much different picture.:
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3pd70a$565@worm.hooked.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3pd66q$3u6@worm.hooked.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df74,b7b23e3700f6d4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public From: jimbar@worm.hooked.net (Jim Barrett) Subject: Re: What "takings"? Private property? Ecology Date: 1995/05/17 Message-ID: <3pd70a$565@worm.hooked.net> X-Deja-AN: 102883937 references: <3pd66q$3u6@worm.hooked.net> organization: hooked newsgroups: ca.environment