🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

3 total messages Started by John A. Keslick, Jr. Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:35
A Closer Look At Trees
#884
Author: John A. Keslick, Jr.
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:35
12 lines
1574 bytes
A Closer Look At Trees Video by Dr. Shigo is available again.

http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/ACLOOK.html


John A. Keslick, Jr.
Tree Biologist
http://www.chesco.com/~treeman
Beware of so-called TREE EXPERTS who do not understand TREE BIOLOGY!
www.treedictionary.com
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
Re: A Closer Look At Trees
#886
Author: Enough Already
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:38
34 lines
2414 bytes
John A. Keslick, Jr. wrote:

> A Closer Look At Trees Video by Dr. Shigo is available again.
>
> http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/ACLOOK.html
>
>
> John A. Keslick, Jr.
> Tree Biologist
> http://www.chesco.com/~treeman
> Beware of so-called TREE EXPERTS who do not understand TREE BIOLOGY!
> www.treedictionary.com
> Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep
reminding us
> that we are not the boss.

One thing's for sure about trees and it can't be stressed enough: A
growing human population means that progressively more trees will be
cut each year. Witness the endless battles over old growth acreage
because tree farms aren't regenerating timber fast enough. 30-50 year
regrowth times do not allow for escalating demand as humans multiply.
New acreage is always being sought to cut on.

Beware of propaganda claiming trees are a "renewable resource" in the
face of constantly rising demand. It's only true if you're willing to
convert more and more timber each year to human-managed status instead
of wild status, and that's exactly what's happening. Especially
worrisome are those who claim that managed forests are "better" (i.e.
more efficient for human needs) than "messy" old growth forests.

E.A.

http://enough_already.tripod.com/
If any other species behaved like Man we'd call it a plague.
Re: A Closer Look At Trees
#875
Author: John A. Keslick, Jr.
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:32
44 lines
2920 bytes
"Enough Already" <enough_already@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1106527081.455069.14580@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> John A. Keslick, Jr. wrote:
>
> > A Closer Look At Trees Video by Dr. Shigo is available again.
> >
> > http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/ACLOOK.html
> >
> >
> > John A. Keslick, Jr.
> > Tree Biologist
> > http://www.chesco.com/~treeman
> > Beware of so-called TREE EXPERTS who do not understand TREE BIOLOGY!
> > www.treedictionary.com
> > Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep
> reminding us
> > that we are not the boss.
>
> One thing's for sure about trees and it can't be stressed enough: A
> growing human population means that progressively more trees will be
> cut each year. Witness the endless battles over old growth acreage
> because tree farms aren't regenerating timber fast enough. 30-50 year
> regrowth times do not allow for escalating demand as humans multiply.
> New acreage is always being sought to cut on.
>
> Beware of propaganda claiming trees are a "renewable resource" in the
> face of constantly rising demand.

http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/M/100TM/fc-20.html
Myth#2


 It's only true if you're willing to
> convert more and more timber each year to human-managed status instead
> of wild status, and that's exactly what's happening. Especially
> worrisome are those who claim that managed forests are "better" (i.e.
> more efficient for human needs) than "messy" old growth forests.
>
> E.A.
>
> http://enough_already.tripod.com/
> If any other species behaved like Man we'd call it a plague.
>
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads