🚀 go-pugleaf

I thought Sarah was agaist private gun ownership period.
joaniec521@ivillage.com (Joyce Hart) wrote in message news:<ac524017.0203251921.1b62cbbc@posting.google.com>...
> Take a look at this and see if you don't agree that the stories are
> unfair:
> 
> Sarah Brady did NOT break any gun laws &#8211; she didn't even come close. 
> The New York Daily News published a retraction on Saturday totally
> taking the blame for their mistake.  Here's what they said:
> 
> CORRECTION 
> 
> A story in some early editions of yesterday's Daily News incorrectly
> reported that gun-control advocate Sarah Brady may have skirted
> Delaware's gun laws when she bought a rifle for her adult son but did
> not declare who was going to own the weapon.
> 
> The Delaware Department of Justice initially insisted to The News that
> gun purchasers must declare who the weapon was intended for so that
> person's background could be checked. Yesterday, a spokeswoman for the
> Delaware Department of Justice said it misinterpreted the law and that
> Brady was not obligated to state that the gun was for her son as long
> as he was legally qualified to own a firearm. In addition, a spokesman
> for Brady said, "Sarah Brady told the gun store that the gun was for
> her son and filled out the forms that they asked her to fill out."
> 
> The News regrets the error.