Article View: ca.firearms
Article #571Reckless Lawsuits And Foolish Laws
From: Neil At Hollywood�.Hom
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:29
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:29
147 lines
7910 bytes
7910 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0099_01C0DA0D.6F5A6900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-400es.html Pistol Whipped: Baseless Lawsuits, Foolish Laws by Robert A. Levy Robert A. Levy is senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato = Institute. Executive Summary=20 Although Congress and the majority of state legislatures have resisted = enacting draconian gun control laws, the courts are the final bulwark in = safeguarding our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Yet the = courts of late have been the scene of unprecedented attacks on that = right as gun control advocates have used the judiciary to make an = end-run around the legislative process. Meritless litigation brought by = government plaintiffs in multiple jurisdictions are just part of a = scheme to force gun makers to adopt policies that legislatures have = wisely rejected. Moreover, the suits are used by politicians to reward = their allies-private attorneys, many of whom are major campaign = contributors-with lucrative contingency fee contracts. Meanwhile, many of the same politicians have exploited a few recent = tragedies to promote their anti-gun agenda. But gun controls haven't = worked and more controls won't help. In fact, many of the recommended = regulations will make matters worse by stripping law-abiding citizens of = their most effective means of self-defense. Violence in America is due = not to the availability of guns but to social pathologies-illegitimacy, = dysfunctional schools, and drug and alcohol abuse. Historically, more = gun laws have gone hand in hand with an explosion of violent crime. Only = during the past decade-with vigorous law enforcement, a booming economy, = and an older population-have we seen dramatic reductions in violence, = coupled with a record number of guns in circulation. Before we compromise constitutional rights expressly recognized in the = Second Amendment, we ought to be sure of three things: first, that we've = identified the real problem; second, that we've pinpointed its cause; = and, third, that our remedy is no more extensive than necessary to fix = the problem. The spreading litigation against gun makers fails all three = tests as do the latest gun control proposals. Guns do not increase = violence; they reduce violence. Banning or regulat-ing firearms will not = eliminate the underlying pathologies. And a less invasive remedy already = exists: enforce existing laws. Full Text of Policy Analysis No. 400 (PDF, 26 pgs, 154 Kb)=20 To view the above, you will need this Adobe Acrobat reader below: http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader ------=_NextPart_000_0099_01C0DA0D.6F5A6900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4612.600" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-400es.html">http://www.cato.org/p= ubs/pas/pa-400es.html</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV> <H2 align=3Dcenter><I>Pistol Whipped:<BR>Baseless Lawsuits, Foolish = Laws</I></H2><!--CHANGE AUTHOR-->by Robert A. Levy<BR>Robert A. Levy is = senior=20 fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute. <P><B>Executive Summary</B> <!--CHANGE TEXT--> <P align=3Dleft>Although Congress and the majority of state legislatures = have=20 resisted enacting draconian gun control laws, the courts are the final = bulwark=20 in safeguarding our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Yet the = courts=20 of late have been the scene of unprecedented attacks on that right as = gun=20 control advocates have used the judiciary to make an end-run around the=20 legislative process. Meritless litigation brought by government = plaintiffs in=20 multiple jurisdictions are just part of a scheme to force gun makers to = adopt=20 policies that legislatures have wisely rejected. Moreover, the suits are = used by=20 politicians to reward their allies—private attorneys, many of whom = are major=20 campaign contributors—with lucrative contingency fee = contracts.</P> <P align=3Dleft>Meanwhile, many of the same politicians have exploited a = few=20 recent tragedies to promote their anti-gun agenda. But gun controls = haven't=20 worked and more controls won't help. In fact, many of the recommended=20 regulations will make matters worse by stripping law-abiding citizens of = their=20 most effective means of self-defense. Violence in America is due not to = the=20 availability of guns but to social pathologies—illegitimacy, = dysfunctional=20 schools, and drug and alcohol abuse. Historically, more gun laws have = gone hand=20 in hand with an explosion of violent crime. Only during the past = decade—with=20 vigorous law enforcement, a booming economy, and an older = population—have we=20 seen dramatic reductions in violence, coupled with a record number of = guns in=20 circulation.</P> <P align=3Dleft>Before we compromise constitutional rights expressly = recognized in=20 the Second Amendment, we ought to be sure of three things: first, that = we've=20 identified the real problem; second, that we've pinpointed its cause; = and,=20 third, that our remedy is no more extensive than necessary to fix the = problem.=20 The spreading litigation against gun makers fails all three tests as do = the=20 latest gun control proposals. Guns do not increase violence; they reduce = violence. Banning or regulat-ing firearms will not eliminate the = underlying=20 pathologies. And a less invasive remedy already exists: enforce existing = laws.</P> <P align=3Dleft><A href=3D"http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa400.pdf">Full = Text of=20 Policy Analysis No. 400 (PDF, 26 pgs, 154 Kb)</A> <FONT size=3D2><BR>To = view the=20 above, you will need this Adobe Acrobat reader below:<BR></FONT><FONT = size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader">http= ://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader</A></FONT></P> <P align=3Dleft> </P></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0099_01C0DA0D.6F5A6900--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jcWK6.1582$N23.152091@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!sandbox.supernews.net!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!feeder.qis.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a039,71da9d2b3e619b43,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10a039,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-11 11:38:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-03!sandbox.supernews.net!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!feeder.qis.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Neil At Hollywood�.Hom" <replyfromyou@spam.email.com> Newsgroups: ca.firearms Subject: Reckless Lawsuits And Foolish Laws Lines: 148 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0099_01C0DA0D.6F5A6900" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: <jcWK6.1582$N23.152091@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:29:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.179.232.8 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 989605775 209.179.232.8 (Fri, 11 May 2001 11:29:35 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:29:35 PDT Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net X-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:27:58 PDT (newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net)