Article View: ca.firearms
Article #608Re: Los Angeles Considers Fingerprinting Gun Buyers
From: BearKat_Ind
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:33
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:33
257 lines
11514 bytes
11514 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C08AA8.12EF8600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If anyone has noticed, this is already the law with the BFSC state = requirement to purchase a handgun. The thumb print is taken when the = BFSC is applied for and is scanned by the state, so they also have a = cross reference to your drivers license which also carries the thumb = print. Some might say Big Brother is here, only Orwell missed the date = of 1984 and should have said 1990 when the BFSC became law. Bear "Neil At Hollywood=AE.Hom" <replyfromyou@spam.email.com> wrote in = message news:%LQb6.6309$13.510312@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net... http://www.channel2000.com/news/stories/news-20010122-222043.html =20 City Considers Law To Fingerprint Gun Buyers Activist Says State Law And Citizens' Rights At Stake Paul J. Young, Staff Writer January 23, 2001, 12:50 a.m. PST=20 =20 LOS ANGELES -- Some members of the Los Angeles City Council are = prepared to vote for a measure that would require gun buyers to provide = fingerprints before they could purchase a firearm.=20 Monday morning, a City Council panel approved the proposal, which now = goes to the entire 15-member council for consideration.=20 Councilman Mike Feuer is the measure's author and says that it would = be an effective tool for local prosecutors to use when building cases = against people who try to illegally purchase guns.=20 "This provision paves the way for tough enforcement when prohibited = persons attempt to buy guns, and it also will deter many from trying in = the first place," Feuer said Monday.=20 Under his proposal, anybody trying to purchase a gun inside city = limits would have to agree to be fingerprinted first.=20 The prints apparently would be kept on file and later utilized by = prosecutors to help identify ex-cons trying to procure firearms.=20 According to Feuer's office, there have been 5,000 such instances = statewide in the last year, but prosecutors have failed to bring solid = cases against the suspects because of questions about their identities.=20 The councilman believes that fingerprinting "will help prosecutors win = convictions of potentially dangerous criminals who illegally attempt to = buy firearms."=20 Sam Paredes, Executive Director of Gun Owners of California, says that = Feuer and those sympathetic to his proposal have a lot to learn about = state law and citizens' rights.=20 "The council panel has just looked at state law and completely ignored = it," Paredes told Channel 2000 Monday.=20 "In California, we have what's called a preemption law. Under its = provisions, the whole area of regulation of firearms ownership is = usurped by the state.=20 "This is not the purview of local communities. And that's so we don't = have a checkerboard of laws on firearms from one locality to another. = The state is the guiding light in these matters."=20 According to Paredes, the state attorney general has an obligation to = step in and stop the city of Los Angeles from trying to enforce a = measure like the one proposed by Feuer.=20 If Sacramento doesn't get involved, Paredes told Channel 2000 that his = organization and other pro-self-defense groups will challenge = fingerprinting.=20 "We'll go to court ourselves," he said.=20 As for what Paredes thinks of Feuer's proposal in general..=20 "It's hokum! In reality, it's a whole bunch of smoke. It's what I like = to call 'slogan legislation.' It sounds good.=20 "They're pushing this piece of legislation [fingerprinting gun owners] = whether it has any impact or not.=20 "There's no secret that L.A. wants fewer gun owners in city limits. = And what better way to intimidate people than have them fingerprinted or = photographed?"=20 Paredes told Channel 2000 that gun owners already undergo background = checks and fill out pages of state and federal forms before they can = purchase a firearm.=20 He added that "law-abiding" citizens shouldn't be fingerprinted like = common criminals when they wish to avail themselves of their Second = Amendment right.=20 Copyright 2001 by Channel 2000. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or = redistributed =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C08AA8.12EF8600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>If anyone has noticed, this is already the law with = the BFSC=20 state requirement to purchase a handgun. The thumb print is taken when = the BFSC=20 is applied for and is scanned by the state, so they also have a cross = reference=20 to your drivers license which also carries the thumb print. Some might = say Big=20 Brother is here, only Orwell missed the date of 1984 and should have = said 1990=20 when the BFSC became law.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Bear</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: = 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV>"Neil At Hollywood=AE.Hom" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:replyfromyou@spam.email.com">replyfromyou@spam.email.com</= A>>=20 wrote in message <A=20 = href=3D"news:%LQb6.6309$13.510312@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net">news:= %LQb6.6309$13.510312@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net</A>...</DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><A=20 = href=3D"http://www.channel2000.com/news/stories/news-20010122-222043.html= ">http://www.channel2000.com/news/stories/news-20010122-222043.html</A></= FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV> <H2>City Considers Law To Fingerprint Gun Buyers</H2> <H3><I>Activist Says State Law And Citizens' Rights At = Stake</I></H3><FONT=20 size=3D2><I><A href=3D"mailto:pyoung@channel2000.com">Paul J. = Young</A>, Staff=20 Writer<BR>January 23, 2001, 12:50 a.m. PST</I></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV> <P><B>LOS ANGELES</B> -- Some members of the <A=20 href=3D"http://www.ci.la.ca.us/">Los Angeles City Council</A> are = prepared to=20 vote for a measure that would require gun buyers to provide = fingerprints=20 before they could purchase a firearm.=20 <P>Monday morning, a City Council panel approved the proposal, which = now goes=20 to the entire 15-member council for consideration.=20 <P><A href=3D"http://www.cityofla.org/council/cd5/">Councilman Mike = Feuer</A> is=20 the measure's author and says that it would be an effective tool for = local=20 prosecutors to use when building cases against people who try to = illegally=20 purchase guns.=20 <P>"This provision paves the way for tough enforcement when prohibited = persons=20 attempt to buy guns, and it also will deter many from trying in the = first=20 place," Feuer said Monday.=20 <P>Under his proposal, anybody trying to purchase a gun inside city = limits=20 would have to agree to be fingerprinted first.=20 <P>The prints apparently would be kept on file and later utilized by=20 prosecutors to help identify ex-cons trying to procure firearms.=20 <P>According to Feuer's office, there have been 5,000 such instances = statewide=20 in the last year, but prosecutors have failed to bring solid cases = against the=20 suspects because of questions about their identities.=20 <P>The councilman believes that fingerprinting "will help prosecutors = win=20 convictions of potentially dangerous criminals who illegally attempt = to buy=20 firearms."=20 <P>Sam Paredes, Executive Director of <A=20 href=3D"http://www.gunownersca.com/">Gun Owners of California</A>, = says that=20 Feuer and those sympathetic to his proposal have a lot to learn about = state=20 law and citizens' rights.=20 <P>"The council panel has just looked at state law and completely = ignored it,"=20 Paredes told Channel 2000 Monday.=20 <P>"In California, we have what's called a preemption law. Under its=20 provisions, the whole area of regulation of firearms ownership is = usurped by=20 the state.=20 <P>"This is not the purview of local communities. And that's so we = don't have=20 a checkerboard of laws on firearms from one locality to another. The = state is=20 the guiding light in these matters."=20 <P>According to Paredes, the state attorney general has an obligation = to step=20 in and stop the city of Los Angeles from trying to enforce a measure = like the=20 one proposed by Feuer.=20 <P>If Sacramento doesn't get involved, Paredes told Channel 2000 that = his=20 organization and other pro-self-defense groups will challenge = fingerprinting.=20 <P>"We'll go to court ourselves," he said.=20 <P>As for what Paredes thinks of Feuer's proposal in general….=20 <P>"It's hokum! In reality, it's a whole bunch of smoke. It's what I = like to=20 call 'slogan legislation.' It sounds good.=20 <P>"They're pushing this piece of legislation [fingerprinting gun = owners]=20 whether it has any impact or not.=20 <P>"There's no secret that L.A. wants fewer gun owners in city limits. = And=20 what better way to intimidate people than have them fingerprinted or=20 photographed?"=20 <P>Paredes told Channel 2000 that gun owners already undergo = background checks=20 and fill out pages of state and federal forms before they can purchase = a=20 firearm.=20 <P>He added that "law-abiding" citizens shouldn't be fingerprinted = like common=20 criminals when they wish to avail themselves of their Second Amendment = right.=20 <P> <P> <P align=3Dright> <P align=3Dleft><I>Copyright 2001 by <A=20 href=3D"mailto:c2knews@Channel2000.com">Channel 2000</A>. All rights=20 reserved.</I></P> <P align=3Dleft><I> This material may not be published, = broadcast,=20 rewritten or redistributed</I></P> <P align=3Dright><EM></EM> </P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C08AA8.12EF8600--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<#Fs$AsuiAHA.338@cpmsnbbsa09>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news-x2.support.nl!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpmsnbbsb04!cpmsnbbsa09References:
<%LQb6.6309$13.510312@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10a039,4fd66ce99e5d4212 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a039,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-30 10:45:09 PST From: "BearKat_Ind" <BearKat_Ind@email.msn.com> References: <%LQb6.6309$13.510312@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Los Angeles Considers Fingerprinting Gun Buyers Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:33:24 -0800 Lines: 258 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C08AA8.12EF8600" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Message-ID: <#Fs$AsuiAHA.338@cpmsnbbsa09> Newsgroups: ca.firearms NNTP-Posting-Host: lbv-ca7a-194.rasserver.net 199.182.114.194 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news-x2.support.nl!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!cpmsnbbsb04!cpmsnbbsa09