Thread View: ca.gen
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by RONALD DZIERZYNSKI
Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00
Executive Search Dirty tricks results
Author: RONALD DZIERZYNSKI
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00
25 lines
2382 bytes
2382 bytes
Executive Search -Dirty Tricks results I've received 733 positive responses and 40 negative comments to date from my dirty tricks post. The negative comments were quite nasty and were all from recruiters I might add. If you recruiters don't do these things that I described and are upstanding recruiters, as you all say that you are, then disregard the post. It wasn't meant as a training vehicle anyway. It was supposed to help prepare the unprepared unemployed to deal with the unethical recruiter that isn't as honest as all of you seem to be. Not one of the recruiters indicated, in their posts, that they felt these dirty tricks did not go on but that I was a bad boy for telling everyone about it. That somehow they would be soiled by the public knowing about these things. Personally, I think that if they are so pure they should feel uplifted knowing that they are such ethical recruiters and have nothing to regret. On the other hand, if they are angry because I have prepared the unknowing to better face some tough situations then I think they should check their own ethics again. For any one of you that did not see the post and would like us to Email you one, please contact us and ask for the dirty tricks #1 post.
Re: Executive Search Dirty tricks results
Author: J. Eric Townsend
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
16 lines
1790 bytes
1790 bytes
"exxsrch" == RONALD DZIERZYNSKI <exxsrch@ix.netcom.com> writes: exxsrch> I've received 733 positive responses and 40 negative comments care to provide some evidence to back up those numbers? Given that it's hard to get >300 people across all of USENET to vote on a newsgroup, whether for *or* against it, I'm surprised you got 700+ people out of a few regional newsgroups. -- J. Eric Townsend jet@genmagic.com USA 408.774.4252 (play: jet@well.sf.ca.us) Unabomber: two words about technological ruin of society -- "Windows 95". <a href="http://www.spies.com/jet/jet.html">URL bandwagon of hipitude</a> *** Affiliation shown for identification and contact purposes only. ***
Re: Executive Search Dirty tricks results
Author: Peter Zelchenko
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
16 lines
1765 bytes
1765 bytes
In article <43ad2f$n10@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>, RONALD DZIERZYNSKI <exxsrch@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Executive Search -Dirty Tricks results > >I've received 733 positive responses and 40 negative comments to date >from my dirty tricks post. The negative comments were quite nasty and >were all from recruiters I might add. Funny, I sent you a negative comment and I'm not a recruiter, so you're just a spam-pusher. Why don't you take this to a business group? -- Peter Zelchenko (pete@chinet.com) | InfoComm Electronic Pre-Press 1757 W. Augusta Blvd. | 213 W. Institute Pl. Chicago, Illinois 60622-3209 | Chicago, Illinois 60610-3125
Re: Executive Search Dirty tricks results
Author: Jamie Eimermann
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
12 lines
1522 bytes
1522 bytes
In article <43ad2f$n10@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>, RONALD DZIERZYNSKI <exxsrch@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Executive Search -Dirty Tricks results > >I've received 733 positive responses and 40 negative comments to date >from my dirty tricks post. The negative comments were quite nasty and >were all from recruiters I might add. How about the notice that your spam had been cancelled? That was hardly a postive comment and not from a recruiter. Jamie
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads