🚀 go-pugleaf

I'm not disagreeing or agreeing at this point.  What does concern me a
great deal is the inordinate amount of advertising that's being done to
defeat Prop 174.  When that kind of money is being spent I can't help
but think there's some motive other than the 'public good'.

Where are the proponents of 174?  I want to hear that side?

Jim

In article <29fbbr$lj4@bmsrs.usc.edu>, degennar@bmsrs.usc.edu (Ray) writes:
|> 
|> Well, I feel that vouchers are an OK first step in getting away from
|> the mess that public schools have become, but I don't think that
|> California's Prop 174 is a good voucher initiaitve.
|> 
|> The state legislator have been trying to use education funds for
|> other means for quite some time.  Prop 174 is written so the money
|> "saved" by giving a child a voucher goes into the state's general
|> fund and that is not a pretty thought.
|> 
|> 
|> -- 
|> 
|> Ray (DJ) DeGennaro II
|> degennar@scf.usc.edu