Re: Vouchers = Yes, Prop 174 = No??

Article View: ca.general

Article #1823

#1823

From: Richard Ottolini
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1993 14:16

13 lines
1601 bytes

In article <CEwp60.6zL@ssf-sys.DHL.COM> jdavis@ssf-sys.DHL.COM (Jim Davis) writes:
>
>I'm not disagreeing or agreeing at this point.  What does concern me a
>great deal is the inordinate amount of advertising that's being done to
>defeat Prop 174.  When that kind of money is being spent I can't help
>but think there's some motive other than the 'public good'.
>
>Where are the proponents of 174?  I want to hear that side?

Last I saw was $1M for the proposition, 80% raised from Christian groups
in S. CA; $10M against the proposition, 80% raised by a special union tax
of $63 on every public school teacher.  A couple of Orange County schools
are being sued for sending anti-174 flyers home with the children.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Oct15.141605.8485@unocal.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!paris.ics.uci.edu!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!stgprao

References: <29fbbr$lj4@bmsrs.usc.edu> <CEwp60.6zL@ssf-sys.DHL.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,57878e0852389951
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: f824f,20e395c0705a556c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public
X-Google-Thread: 114ca8,57878e0852389951
X-Google-Attributes: gid114ca8,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-10-15 10:27:54 PST
Newsgroups: ca.general,alt.politics.libertarian,ba.general
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!library.ucla.edu!paris.ics.uci.edu!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!stgprao
From: stgprao@st.unocal.COM (Richard Ottolini)
Subject: Re: Vouchers = Yes, Prop 174 = No??
Message-ID: <1993Oct15.141605.8485@unocal.com>
Sender: news@unocal.com (Unocal USENET News)
Organization: Unocal Corporation
References: <29fbbr$lj4@bmsrs.usc.edu> <CEwp60.6zL@ssf-sys.DHL.COM>
Distribution: ca
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1993 14:16:05 GMT
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message