🚀 go-pugleaf

Data Rentals and Sales writes
> In article <CEwp60.6zL@ssf-sys.DHL.COM> jdavis@ssf-sys.DHL.COM (Jim Davis)  
writes:
> >
> >Where are the proponents of 174?  I want to hear that side?
> 
> They are mostly the 'moral majority', i.e. those of conservative
> religeous views (including a witches' organization).  

This is what the teachers' unions would have you believe.  I know a lot of  
people who are for 174, and very few of them are religious right wingers.  Most  
of pro-174 crowd want to give parents a wider latitude in giving their children  
an education without being forced through the government education monopoly. 

> The thing I don't
> like about prop 174 is that even if nobody changes what school they're
> in, the public schools lose over $1Billion.

Of course, there is another perspective on this.  If 174 passes, the people who  
are currently sending their children to private schools will no longer be  
getting screwed by paying high taxes for public education AND tuitions for  
private schools.  Seems fair to me.

> 
> 
> -- 
> #include	<standard.disclaimer>
>  _
> Kevin D Quitt			96.37% of all statistics are made up

--
Jim Brownfield (Jim_Brownfield@Radical.Com)  NeXTmail accepted
Radical System Solutions, Inc.
rad i cal \'rad-i-kel\ n -- a basic principle: FOUNDATION