🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.general
Article #20548

Re: Blatant gay discrimination

#20548
From: Michael James
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 1995 00:00
112 lines
5250 bytes
djk@TASP.NET (Daniel J. Karnes) writes:

>> Since that's me I feel I can add to the general hubub of dissent
>> with mr. Karnes:
>>

>Oh joy.

Oh my goodness, you must be pleased. Just wipe the mess off the keyboards after
you finish.

>> > Except one is justified and homosexuals are not. :)
>> 
>> Justified by who? Or by what?
>>                   ^^^^^^^^^^

>God's law. Their own actions. Me.
                               ^^
To answer each of the three sentences:
1) "God's Law", which is? Does it say anything about lying?
2) "Their own actions"- as opposed to your own fine upstanding heterosexual
   actions... Oh that reminds me, didn't you post a message on 12 June 1994
   called "I WAS THERE!!!!!!! :) :) :)" in which you said:

	"I was there at you-guys "pride" parade in L.A. today! Hehehehehehehe!
         Haw!Haw!Haw! <snicker><snicker><snicker> GUFFAW! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL!

	I had a lot of fun acting like a faggot [...] I was in the area for a 
	luncheon with some friends at Cask & Cleaver, but just *had* to drop 
        by and see my little buddies! :) :) :)

	[...] I was even on TV wearing my little fruit-badge!!!!!!

	Great FUN!!!!!!! I can't wait until next years LA Pride! I'll even go
	in drag!!!!!!!!"

   Hmm, did you have a nice time in your dress this year? :):):):):)

3) "Me"- ROTFL!!! For actual archive proof of Daniel's "power", WWW
    http://www.cathouse.org/cathouse/urban.legends/karnes.miniFAQ, or
    ftp ftp.cathouse.org/cathouse/urban.legends/karnes.miniFAQ. Hmmm, I
    wonder if you're going to go on about some sort of "agenda" at this
    point?

>> I read an intersting argument the
>> other day that a certain percentage of homosexuals is evolutionary
>> a good idea: a group that has some people who are not preoccupied
>> with their own offspring but can work for the common good has
>> a higher overall chance of survival. In a nutshell.

>HAHAHAHAHAHA! How rich!! I agree that homosex is "evolutionary a good
>idea" but there is no lofty purpose involved at all... Simply survival
>of the fittest and natural selection in action. [...]

Hmmm, what about all those L/G/Bs who go to gym- you know, pretty fit.
Intelligence as well, so people like me are alright too! <g> Though this 
surely *does* assume a return to an enviroment of rigourous natural selection.
(Is this part of your "traditional values"?)

>[...] Sort of like nature looks at what was created (the individual 
>pre-queer person) and says [...]

Er, wait a second here, you *are* saying "created" by "nature" ie natural.
And this is against "God's Law", or is it just one or your usual lines of
contradicitory thought?

>BLAUGH!!! Did I ever screw up!!! Shame on me! [...]

Hmmm, are we still talking about Nature, or have we moved onto DJK? ;)

>[...] - And so to ensure that
>the mistake is not able propagate itself beyond the original screw-up
>state certain wires get crossed and the screw-up gets more interested
>in things like feces, urine, masturbation, etc. [...]
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Er, well I am not, but you obviously are, which presumably means that you
are homosexual. ;)

>[...] and *POOF* you have a homosexual!!! The mistake stops there, and it 
>does not become part of the gene pool!

Small point- if homosexuality doesn't become part of the gene pool, how come 
it still persists? Anyway, what's this obsession with the "gene pool"? Sounds
a bit supremacist if you ask me.

>> Apart from such objective arguments, I doubt that you know
>> any homosexuals from up close, and your ramblings are just that.
>> Without any basis in informed fact.

>You are wrong. I know many homosex victims. [...]
                                    ^^^^^^^
Victims of what? Crap DJK postings? ;)

>[...] I've had far far too much experience with that ilk.
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^
>I speak from experience.

Daniel, if any of your postings (inc. the one about appearing at the
LA Pride) is to believed, then you have not really experienced anything, except
thtough the filter glass of your own perceptions and prejudices. As with your
career as a crap flamer, if you have had any genuine experience, you haven't
exactly learned from it. :):)

Michael.



--
-----------------------------------------   { Opinions are mine, etc., etc..}
| Michael James <895822ja@udcf.gla.ac.uk>|-   ------------------------------
-----------------------------------------| | |http://www.gla.ac.uk/~895822ja|
  -----------------------------------------   ------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <895822ja.803226143@cent.gla.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <EIJKHOUT.95Jun6141309@jacobi.math.ucla.edu> <gwPF7c1w165w@TASP.NET>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,2ba1f5c72723a16a
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bb69,f942d97e57477a07
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb69,public
From: 895822ja@cent.gla.ac.uk (Michael James)
Subject: Re: Blatant gay discrimination
Date: 1995/06/15
Message-ID: <895822ja.803226143@cent.gla.ac.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 104504446
sender: news@udcf.gla.ac.uk (News)
references: <EIJKHOUT.95Jun6141309@jacobi.math.ucla.edu> <gwPF7c1w165w@TASP.NET>
organization: Glasgow University Computing Service
newsgroups: ca.general,alt.politics.homosexuality