Article View: ca.general
Article #20578Re: Is our election system unfair?
From: James Ogle
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 1995 00:00
41 lines
3242 bytes
3242 bytes
I agree with you. Furthermore, there is a Canadian organization that is promoting fairer elections called "The Democracy League". Their email address is umweiss4@cc.umanitoba.ca. --James in California Pangster (apnalli@idirect.com) wrote: : Consider this.... : Lets say there were only two parties, "A" and "B". If 49% of the people : in each electoral district voted for Party A, and 51% voted for Party B, : this would result in ALL of the Party B candidates winning every seat in : Parliament. Party B, therefore, would have a majority (100%) government. : Yet, 49% of the population chose Party A. Are these people being represented : in Parliament. Supposedly they would be, but by the OTHER person. : Case in point...In Ottawa, the "Official opposition" is the Bloc Quebecois. : Is that to say that the majority of the people of Canada voted Liberal, and : in second place - by total votes (votes=taxpayers=real people) would be : the Bloc. I have a hard time believeing that! : Theoretically, if 40% vote Liberal, the Grits should hold 40% of the seats. : Likewise, for the second place Reformers (I assume) who should hold the : next largest percentage of seats based on total votes, and so on. : In Ontario, for example, there is much discussion on who I might feel is : the best Leader, Rae, McLeod, or Harris. But that is really irrelevant. : I am not voting for them, I must choose between the candidates in my riding. : Really, if I chose to vote for the Natural Law Party (as a few people do) : that vote is essentially wasted. Even if 1% of voters choose Natural Law, : in all fairness those voters should be represented by NL MPP's holding : 1% of the seats. : I think we should vote for the LEADER. The one with the most votes must : therefore have the confidence of the majority of the population. Votes : can then be divided regionally, and if the people of Brampton South were : more inclined to vote NDP (for example) then that area would have an NDP : MPP and that would count toward that party's pecentage of seats. : Whew, I feel better now! Even though it will probably never change! --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<joogleD9nBsC.I5G@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Edda1995Jun4.005315.2197@news.compulink.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,18d9c9990c6a483f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: f504b,18d9c9990c6a483f,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: fc3d0,18d9c9990c6a483f,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d0,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,18d9c9990c6a483f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,18d9c9990c6a483f,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,18d9c9990c6a483f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public From: joogle@netcom.com (James Ogle) Subject: Re: Is our election system unfair? Date: 1995/06/04 Message-ID: <joogleD9nBsC.I5G@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 103783288 sender: joogle@netcom4.netcom.com references: <Edda1995Jun4.005315.2197@news.compulink.com> followup-to: ca.general,ca.politics,can.general,can.politics,ont.general,tor.general organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) newsgroups: ca.general,ca.politics,can.general,can.politics,ont.general,tor.general