Article View: ca.general
Article #2065Re: ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE, 3
From: Jon Krueger
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 00:00
13 lines
1373 bytes
1373 bytes
> So when the anti-smoking funds are passed out to various researchers > (e.g., Glantz), the facts change accordingly too? Interesting point. Well, when scientific, medical, and health organizations pay the research bills, the results have sometimes been different from those coming out of tobacco company sponsored, lawyer-supervised "research". You're welcome to believe which ever you find most credible. Apropos of Joe's point, CU (Consumer Reports) accepts no funding from either Glantz or Philip Morris. Forbes cannot make the same statement. -- Jon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JPK.95Nov10225554@firefly.incog.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<479p67$cv6@covina.lightside.com> <199511060427.FAA13851@utopia.hacktic.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,779011c90af62756 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 10df74,779011c90af62756 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df74,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,779011c90af62756 X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: f5696,779011c90af62756 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5696,public From: jpk@firefly.incog.com (Jon Krueger) Subject: Re: ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE, 3 Date: 1995/11/11 Message-ID: <JPK.95Nov10225554@firefly.incog.com> X-Deja-AN: 119132673 references: <479p67$cv6@covina.lightside.com> <199511060427.FAA13851@utopia.hacktic.nl> followup-to: ca.general,ca.politics,ca.environment,alt.smokers organization: Internet Commerce Group newsgroups: ca.general,ca.politics,ca.environment,alt.smokers