Re: SF Bernal Bi Club

Article View: ca.general

Article #20674

#20674

From: DaveHatunen
Date: Wed, 24 May 1995 00:00

24 lines
1638 bytes

In article <3pu6s3$bjn@news.agt.net>, Kevin Auld <kauld@agt.net> wrote:
>In article <dpletcheD8yys9.4Fn@netcom.com>, dpletche@netcom.com (David Pletcher) says:
>
>>Because ca.general is the CALIFORNIA newsgroup.  [Resisting the
>>temptation to hostility towards this loudmouth clueless newbie,]
>>Why don't you try can.general?  Clue:  Have you seen anything
>>about Canada in ca.general?  I didn't think so.  Second clue:
>>usenet heirarchies have no correspondence to domains.
>>-- David Pletcher
>
>Nevertheless, wouldn't the article be more appropriate in alt.queers, or something?

May have been there. But why wouldn't it also be appropriate in a
California newsgroup? It is a California organization, after all. Or are
you suggesting that California organizational notices shouldn't appear
in a California newsgroup, or at least this one?

-- 


    ********** DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@netcom.com) **********
    *     Daly City California: almost San Francisco      *
    *   but with parking and lower car insurance rates    *
    *******************************************************

Technical Details

Message-ID: <hatunenD93D7H.G3y@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3ph5hl$drs@crl9.crl.com> <3poove$bk1@news.agt.net> <dpletcheD8yys9.4Fn@netcom.com> <3pu6s3$bjn@news.agt.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,eabb57138d098a72
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
From: hatunen@netcom.com (DaveHatunen)
Subject: Re: SF Bernal Bi Club
Date: 1995/05/24
Message-ID: <hatunenD93D7H.G3y@netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 103285048
sender: hatunen@netcom9.netcom.com
references: <3ph5hl$drs@crl9.crl.com> <3poove$bk1@news.agt.net> <dpletcheD8yys9.4Fn@netcom.com> <3pu6s3$bjn@news.agt.net>
organization: As little as you're likely to find anywhere
newsgroups: ca.general

Reply to Parent Message