Article View: ca.general
Article #20844Re: Domestic Partners-Same Sex Relations -PLEASE READ
From: Riot Nrrrd
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 00:00
14 lines
1583 bytes
1583 bytes
karenk@hprnd.rose.hp.com (Karen Kimball), while prying the lemmings from hir ankles, exclaimed: > I do agree that marriage, and commitment to _stay_ married, >needs to regain value in our society, and that the lack of same is >a major contributor to a lot of our social ills. I get the feeling that you were trying to build consensus with the person to whom you were responding, and that's the real intent behind the quoted paragraph. However, I think it came out really badly. Please enlighten me -- to exactly which social ills am I contributing by remaining unmarried? Piglet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3meqf3$m5r@panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3m2311$jjt@canyon.sr.hp.com> <3m3q2r$7nh@hpchase.rose.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: f9532,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9532,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: ff809,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gidff809,public X-Google-Thread: f6bff,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6bff,public X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,26ae53ce0ac79c9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public From: piglet@panix.com (Riot Nrrrd) Subject: Re: Domestic Partners-Same Sex Relations -PLEASE READ Date: 1995/04/11 Message-ID: <3meqf3$m5r@panix.com> X-Deja-AN: 100200972 references: <3m2311$jjt@canyon.sr.hp.com> <3m3q2r$7nh@hpchase.rose.hp.com> organization: The House at Brisingamen Corner newsgroups: ca.general,ca.politics,la.personals,misc.wanted,misc.legal,soc.bi,soc.couples