Article View: ca.general
Article #20905Are there enemy spies lurking along the e-mail route?
From: Don Reynolds
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 00:00
82 lines
3231 bytes
3231 bytes
Article 1235 of cle.general: Path: usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gw1.att.com!gw2.att.com!neoucom.edu!eff!eff!not-for-mail From: brown@eff.org (Dan Brown) >Newsgroups: cle.general Subject: Re: Are there enemy spies lurking along the e-mail route? Date: 22 Mar 1995 13:06:57 -0500 Organization: Subversive Student Publications un-inc. Lines: 61 Message-ID: <3kpp01$1vi@eff.org> References: <3kho0q$a03@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <D5pKq3.F0o@hamnet.wariat.org> <3kl7p6$jj0@eff.org> <D5t9Dt.767@hamnet.wariat.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: eff.org In an earlier posting patrick@hamnet.wariat.org (Patrick Lewis) writes: > >Tell Mitnick that...in his prison cell. Anyways, sure.. If you WANT >to read something that is unencrypted, it's entirely possible. The issue >is, most people don't want to and it generally doesn't happen. Thats kinda like saying most people don't want to steal your car, so you might as well pull the locks off. >That is not to say, however, that it CAN'T happen. Mitnick proved that it >does. Mitnick and many others. >If you have 10Base-T wires on an IPX-based network, you can buy a product >called a Vampire Spike, stick it in the line, and see everything that's >going thru the line. If you have a PC with an Ethernet card, you can get a variety of _FREE_ software (say... Linux) and monitor traffic on the net. >Tempest isn't _that_ good, however, it is effective for tapping transmissions >over wires. The biggest protection against tempest is the fact that it costs LOTS. Its not something I typically worry about... but then, I'm not pushing classified info over my net. Dunno... guess my real points are: 1. NEVER assume that your Email is secure. Its not. There are TOO many ways that it can be read, including tapping on the network, a root level user just reading the file, a bounce going someplace it shouldn't, etc etc. 2. Use strong, secure encryption routines if you want to make your mail (or any other data) private. PGP is one of the few programs out there that I'd really consider private any more. DES is not impossible to break, Clipper/Capstone (whatever they are calling it) is open to the Gov't (or whoever happens to grab the keys), etc. 3. Push the gov't to lift the export restrictions on strong crypto so that its possible for everyone to use stuff like PGP, and its possible for decent authentication routines to be developed and implemented on the Internet... which is basically a world wide net. later. Dan -- -- Online.. | | (Dan Brown brown@eff.org) _/| __/| _ |/ |/ Or... Flatline. _________________ If you know more about e-mail security? Please post your reply fn979@cleveland.freenet.edu D.Esq (Alias the Jackal)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3lhskb$lk2@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,66e8049dd8b8457a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public From: fn979@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Don Reynolds) Subject: Are there enemy spies lurking along the e-mail route? Date: 1995/03/31 Message-ID: <3lhskb$lk2@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> X-Deja-AN: 100675503 organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA) newsgroups: ca.general