Article View: ca.general
Article #20928Re: 10-ATT Phone Bill rip-Off
From: Alex Morando
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 00:00
21 lines
1234 bytes
1234 bytes
In article <3l3c24$9o6@ccnet3.ccnet.com>, TEIXEIRA <teixeira@ccnet.com> wrote: >I was sent info by ATT stating that if I used 10-ATT before local tole >calls I would save 20-40%. Well they billed me almost double of Bell >rates for the same calls. > >Has anyone else been ripped off by ATT? > The costs between the various companies are within pennies of each other for local long distance. I tend to use AT&T even though I live in GTE territory. However, you'd want to use your local telco when making local calls. You'd want something back for your $20 monthly service fee. Anyone else will charge you for calling your neighbor. >Don -- ! Alex Morando, Engineer-at-large - arm@netcom.com,amoran@aol.com ! My employer does not usually agree with the views given above.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<armD68tDJ.IIo@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3l3c24$9o6@ccnet3.ccnet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,264fea5e8f266137,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public From: arm@netcom.com (Alex Morando) Subject: Re: 10-ATT Phone Bill rip-Off Date: 1995/03/30 Message-ID: <armD68tDJ.IIo@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 100562623 sender: arm@netcom6.netcom.com references: <3l3c24$9o6@ccnet3.ccnet.com> organization: Bear City Waterworks 1-800-GRR-RAWR newsgroups: ca.general