Article View: ca.general
Article #21047Re: Liberal Media
From: Merlin Dorfman
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1994 17:37
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1994 17:37
40 lines
2901 bytes
2901 bytes
Dave Erickson (Dave.Erickson%ow@salata.com) wrote:
: The reason the media is predominantly liberal is because liberalism allows
: them to promote excessive democracy and then deplore the consequences.
This constant whining about the so-called "liberal media"
absolutely cracks me up. Here are the first three paragraphs from a
front-page story in last Friday's San Jose Mercury News. The Merc is
supposedly one of the most liberal of the "liberal media." The story
was written by a Los Angeles Times writer:
"This week an erratic White House decided on someone the
Washington press corps considers a reasonable man to be President
Clinton's press secretary.
"He is Mike McCurry, the 40-year-old spokesman for the State
Department. And if the White House doesn't change its course at the
last minute, soon it will be his job to deflect the hostility aimed
at Clinton. Soon it will be up to McCurry, once the editor of his
high school newspaper in Redwood City, to deliver a few well-chosen
words rather than the torrent that has spewed forth from this White
House. When Newt Gingrich dribbles toward the net for another slam
dunk, it will be McCurry's role to leap up and stop him.
"White House sources say McCurry is expected to be named any day
now to replace DeeDee Myers, 33, whose last day on the job was
Thursday. White House reporters personally liked her but were in the
habit of bypassing her because she was kept out of the loop. Byt he
time the White House bothered to build her up it was too late.
Clinton apparently needed a person with a more forceful image to
defend him, and build him up, particularly before male heads of
households who don't seem to like the president."
Not very pro-liberal. What would the Washington Times or Rush
Limbaugh say that was any different? The media have been taking
pot-shots like this at Clinton since he first came on the scene. I
don't think the media is really pro-conservative; they're just very
cynical, feel like they're not doing their job unless they're being
very critical, and are looking to be the next Woodward and Bernstein.
Merlin Dorfman
DORFMAN@NETCOM.COM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dorfmanD1HCy9.5yp@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!dorfmanReferences:
<e3b_9412222305@salata.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,d1bbdb660f99d208,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-27 09:52:13 PST Newsgroups: ca.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!dorfman From: dorfman@netcom.com (Merlin Dorfman) Subject: Re: Liberal Media Message-ID: <dorfmanD1HCy9.5yp@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <e3b_9412222305@salata.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1994 17:37:20 GMT Lines: 41