Article View: ca.general
Article #21112Re: Prop 187 Supporters
From: Kevin Carothers
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 18:32
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 18:32
56 lines
3487 bytes
3487 bytes
William Y Huang (wyhuang@raman.ucsd.edu) wrote:
> Actually the Mex. men who come here work hard .... I think they put
> in a lot more than they take out (if not by paying taxes, then by
> providing downward wage pressure to save us money). The problem
> are the illegal women .... they come here just to have babies and
> milk the welfare system.
True enough, there is a net MONETARY economic benefit.
I think the more sublime issue(s) with 187 involves the economic
"social costs" with having the illegals over here. To wit;
a. Hospitals have an "open door" policy towards illegal aliens --
An illegal alien is "given" better, if not equal, health
care as LEGAL (ie; state and federal income tax paying
NON-INSURED US citizens). Why should the country and state
at large pay this, with the country of Mexico not affording the
same benefits in return to US citizens? HINT -- It's NOT
because Mexico CAN'T...It's because they WON'T.
b. There is a "surfacing" of abuses of this policy -- Rich
(yes, rich, landowning, business owning, college-educated,
Mercedez Benz driving) Mexicans coming across the border for free
obstetrics and operations, claiming to be poor. THOUSANDS of them.
c. Unappreciative illegal aliens getting a lions share of media
coverage (ie; the famous "Mexican flags over Figeroa St."
incident).
d. The amount of benefits received is rather large, statistically,
per illegal citizen ($15B / 4M illegal aliens = $1,250 / per
illegal alien per year).
e. There is a huge social cost towards having a population of
approx. 4 million people per year living at poverty
level (crime, tuberculosis, STD's, prostitution,
drugs, etc...).
The basic philosophy of 187 is that it recognizes that Mexicans aren't
stupid and helpless. It recognizes that there is a $15B+ "entitlement"
program which we are not going to shell out anymore to anyone who comes
across the border illegally. If a Mexican citizen comes in to St. John's
Hospital with a broken leg, (s)he will be helped. If the same citizen
comes in with a runny nose, (s)he will not.
The legeslative intent of 187 (hence, its ambiguity in places) was to
leave "holes" such that the California public officials charged with
implementing 187 policy can implement it somewhat "at their own
discretion" -- ie; teachers "should" report pupils that are illegal
illegal aliens...and so on and so forth.
If anyone cares to argue these points, let's go.
--
Kevin Carothers kevin@drogges.tti.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1994Nov30.183210.5380@ttinews.tti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ttinews!drogges.tti.com!kevinReferences:
<3b65h7$g1u@nic-nac.CSU.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,32a0ade2d8821aac X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,32a0ade2d8821aac X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-30 10:52:29 PST Newsgroups: ca.general,ca.politics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ttinews!drogges.tti.com!kevin From: kevin@drogges.tti.com (Kevin Carothers) Subject: Re: Prop 187 Supporters Message-ID: <1994Nov30.183210.5380@ttinews.tti.com> Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin) Nntp-Posting-Host: drogges.tti.com Organization: Transaction Technology, Inc. X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3 References: <3b65h7$g1u@nic-nac.CSU.net> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 18:32:10 GMT Lines: 56