🚀 go-pugleaf

|> 
|> >Dianne Feinstein is, since her life has been followed almost since her
|> >birth, due to her famous physican father.  But who knows from him?  
|> 
|> Ah, so only those who are *born into* wealth are acceptable in politics.
|> Kennedys and Feinsteins rule!
|> 
|> 
|> --
|> Alan Denney      aland@informix.com      I'm Pro-Anarchy...   and I Vote!

you forgot Mr. Nothington, who was also born into wealth. 
 
BTW, if he's such a good businessman, do you think he'd invest almost 
$30M into a campaign and expect no return on his investment?  I don't
think he's as altruistic as he'd like us to believe.  Here is a guy
who:

- ran anti-Feinstein commercials during the primary, showing absolute
disrespect for his opponents (no wonder republicans would rather support 
DiFi) 

- started the negative campaigning early, enough so that we all became
reminded once again why we're so sick of the political process

- decided 10 months into his freshman term in Congress to run for Senator,
foregoing a chance to gain more insight (and allies for that matter) into
how the system works.  Insight he'd need to dismantle government, which
was a campaign promise of his.  No wonder he could not articulate a plan
for restructuring government.

- sent his wife to debate his primary opponents.  Not even the dreaded
Clinton did that!

- when coming out for 187, did not admit to, but waited until it was determined 
that he hired an illegal alien, then tried to put the best spin on it, effectively
hiding behind his wife.  Then before getting his facts straight, goes with 
another negative ad calling Feinstein a liar.  Held a press conference too, he
almost went blue in the face with his accusations.  Looked like he could
dish it out, but can't take it.

I'm glad a majority of Californians saw through his smokescreen.  

David