🚀 go-pugleaf

First let me say I'm a Republican.  But Huffington is _so_ extreme in his
misrepresentation of the facts that I can't stand to vote for him.  Note the
differences in the two situations.

Michael Huffington hired an illegal alien or his wife did -- he keeps
saying it's her fault but he takes responsibility which means nothing,
in 1986.  Hiring this person was illegal and they new it.  They
didn't pay full taxes, and Huffington now blames illegal immigrants _and_those_
_who_hire_them_ for California's problems, yes accepts almost no
responsibility for the situation, alternately blaming his wife and complaining
that everyone breaks some laws sometimes.

Feinstein asked for papers which she really didn't need to see, since hiring
aliens was not illegal back in 1986, saw papers, taxes on the employee, and
doesn't try to make illegals a scapegoat for the state's problems.  These
situations are totally different.

I urge other Republican, even "right-wing conservatives" like myself.  Look at
Huffington.  Look at what he claims Feinstein says and does (like voting for
student loans -- should she vote against student loans because her husband
has investments in a company that might benefit?) and then read the facts.
Look at his new flyer which tries to make it appear like he is a veteran.
I never thought I'd vote for Feinstein, but at some point you need to say
"Enough is enough" and balance the policies a person stands for against their
integrity or lack of it.
-- 
 
-- Alan                        # Mountain Dew and doughnuts...
   alan@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov     # because breakfast is the most important meal
                               # of the day.