🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ca.general
Article #21258

Re: Re(2): State propaganda (anti-smoking)

#21258
From: David H. Close
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 1994 05:57
52 lines
3105 bytes
In ca.general helfman@aerospace.aero.org (Robert S. Helfman) writes:

>Michael Huffington's ads and Pete Wilson's ads are some of the most
>intolerant, one-sided, smug things I'VE ever heard. And they lie.
>And they have no "redeeming social value" (as the Supreme Court would
>have put it), either. At least the anti-smoking ads aren't obscene.

Your honor, I move to strike as non-responsive to the question. The subject
was the anti-smoking ads. Almost all political ads are one-sided but at
least they aren't paid for by tax money!


>driving. BFD.

>>
And alcohol producers are allowed to respond with their own ads.

>Oh, so it's ok for elected representatives (most of whom are totally
>beholden to lobbyists) to NOT act in the public interest, but it's
>somehow suspect if the voters do it themselves?

Were you agreeing that voters were NOT acting in the public interest?

>As an ACLU member, I couldn't agree more. But I'll bet almost anything that
>YOU bad-mouth the ACLU at every possible opportunity.

I only object to the hypocrisy of being in favor of civil rights only
so long as those rights are politically correct. The ACLU does a lot
of useful things and its principles are on the right track.

I do resent being characterized in this way, merely because I'm trying
to defend a position (against tax-supported propaganda) which the ACLU
should also defend, and has on other issues.

>I could have GUESSED - Orange County!

I've lived many places, and in OC only for about a year. One goes where
the jobs are and where the quality of life is personally attractive.
Moving to OC didn't change my politics, and (unfortunately) I haven't
had much impact on OC either.

One measure of maturity and intelligence might be the ability to step
back from things which benefit one's self and apply general principles
impartially. I don't like smoke, I do approve of the initiative
process, I support free enterprise advertising, but I oppose these
ads as an inappropriate use of governmental power.

There, was I reasonable enough to keep this discussion on the subject?
-- 
Dave Close, Compata, Costa Mesa CA	"Politics is the business of getting
dave@compata.ccss.com, +1 714 434 7359	 power and privilege without
dhclose@alumni.caltech.edu		 possessing merit." - P. J. O'Rourke
Technical Details
Message-ID: <37ftre$8hb@gap.cco.caltech.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!dhclose
References: <1238626270.20859313@iguana.iguanabbs.com> <377tfd$i19@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <37bur2$31e@news.aero.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,380de9cbd0de7fa
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-13 10:55:42 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!dhclose
From: dhclose@alumni.caltech.edu (David H. Close)
Newsgroups: ca.general
Subject: Re: Re(2): State propaganda (anti-smoking)
Date: 12 Oct 1994 05:57:02 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <37ftre$8hb@gap.cco.caltech.edu>
References: <1238626270.20859313@iguana.iguanabbs.com> <377tfd$i19@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <37bur2$31e@news.aero.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #12 (NOV)