Article View: ca.general
Article #21258Re: Re(2): State propaganda (anti-smoking)
From: David H. Close
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 1994 05:57
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 1994 05:57
52 lines
3105 bytes
3105 bytes
In ca.general helfman@aerospace.aero.org (Robert S. Helfman) writes: >Michael Huffington's ads and Pete Wilson's ads are some of the most >intolerant, one-sided, smug things I'VE ever heard. And they lie. >And they have no "redeeming social value" (as the Supreme Court would >have put it), either. At least the anti-smoking ads aren't obscene. Your honor, I move to strike as non-responsive to the question. The subject was the anti-smoking ads. Almost all political ads are one-sided but at least they aren't paid for by tax money! >driving. BFD. >> And alcohol producers are allowed to respond with their own ads. >Oh, so it's ok for elected representatives (most of whom are totally >beholden to lobbyists) to NOT act in the public interest, but it's >somehow suspect if the voters do it themselves? Were you agreeing that voters were NOT acting in the public interest? >As an ACLU member, I couldn't agree more. But I'll bet almost anything that >YOU bad-mouth the ACLU at every possible opportunity. I only object to the hypocrisy of being in favor of civil rights only so long as those rights are politically correct. The ACLU does a lot of useful things and its principles are on the right track. I do resent being characterized in this way, merely because I'm trying to defend a position (against tax-supported propaganda) which the ACLU should also defend, and has on other issues. >I could have GUESSED - Orange County! I've lived many places, and in OC only for about a year. One goes where the jobs are and where the quality of life is personally attractive. Moving to OC didn't change my politics, and (unfortunately) I haven't had much impact on OC either. One measure of maturity and intelligence might be the ability to step back from things which benefit one's self and apply general principles impartially. I don't like smoke, I do approve of the initiative process, I support free enterprise advertising, but I oppose these ads as an inappropriate use of governmental power. There, was I reasonable enough to keep this discussion on the subject? -- Dave Close, Compata, Costa Mesa CA "Politics is the business of getting dave@compata.ccss.com, +1 714 434 7359 power and privilege without dhclose@alumni.caltech.edu possessing merit." - P. J. O'Rourke
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37ftre$8hb@gap.cco.caltech.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!dhcloseReferences:
<1238626270.20859313@iguana.iguanabbs.com> <377tfd$i19@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <37bur2$31e@news.aero.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,380de9cbd0de7fa X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-13 10:55:42 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!dhclose From: dhclose@alumni.caltech.edu (David H. Close) Newsgroups: ca.general Subject: Re: Re(2): State propaganda (anti-smoking) Date: 12 Oct 1994 05:57:02 GMT Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 52 Message-ID: <37ftre$8hb@gap.cco.caltech.edu> References: <1238626270.20859313@iguana.iguanabbs.com> <377tfd$i19@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <37bur2$31e@news.aero.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #12 (NOV)