Article View: ca.general
Article #21701Re: When does the sales tax go DOWN?
From: Bruce James Robert Linley
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 1994 05:38
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 1994 05:38
53 lines
3564 bytes
3564 bytes
In ye olden post broudy@mizar.usc.edu (David S. Broudy) spake... >In article <2vka8k$4r@crl.crl.com> >dk@crl.com (David A. Kaye) writes: > >> It's because of Prop 13. Counties can no longer count on property tax Oh please. Prop 13 is a godsend. It's meant to protect fixed-income (usually retired) people who who would be otherwise taxed out of their house because the house they bought in 1967 increased in value from $20,000 to $200,000. This lets people plan their retirement and not have to worry about what kind of bill the gov't is going to hand them next year. People who whine about prop 13 will be singing a different tune when their property value goes up substantially (if they hold onto their home that long). BTW, with the recent dipping of property values in CA, people who bought their homes in the 80s are paying _more_ in prop tax than they should because of prop 13, but the liberal press neglects that little factoid and I suspect that you could care less about that. Prop 13 bashers are a bunch of snotty jealous impatient whiners who can't stand the fact that they are not instantly enjoying the benefits of 20-year homeowners. These people _invested_ in their future and are now enjoying the benefits that (waaaaaaa!) you want now or spitefully want to deprive them of (the f***-you-too mentality). >I say, soak the rich. Ah! there's the aforementioned mentality showing itself right now! >Of course, if I were rich, I wouldn't say that. But, I'm not and >don't plan to be anytime real soon. Plus, the rich can afford a translation: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. This doesn't work. (ref Russia) Furthermore, mild tax increases on the lower and middle class generate more revenue than steep tax hikes on the rich. Why? Guess who there's more of? Of course, I do not believe that is right to tax people differently based on their incomes. I support a flat percentage federal and state (for those states that do so) income tax. Everyone pays proportionally the same amount. This would make things very fair for everyone and simplify paperwork greatly for you and for the gov't saving even more money. No muss. No fuss. (Annual income) * 0.15 mailed in to Uncle Sam every year. I suppose this thread could be expanded to talk about the universal health care (*ahem*) plan, but that's another post. Do not consider any of the above as an attack upon you personally. It is also meant as an attack upon all of the we-need-bigger-gov't tax-tax-tax pinko liberalites. -- Bruce James Robert Linley ---- linley@netcom.com ---- Amateur radio: KE6EQZ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "Another visitor. Stay a while.... Stay FOREVER!" -=-=-=-=-=-=-
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<linleyCsnro9.KCA@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!get.hooked.net!decwrl!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!csusac.ecs.csus.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!linleyReferences:
<linleyCsA91y.FnK@netcom.com> <2vka8k$4r@crl.crl.com> <2vkpnd$k6u@usc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,c89d5cb73d7eee6d X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,c89d5cb73d7eee6d X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-08 23:02:57 PST Newsgroups: ca.general,la.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!get.hooked.net!decwrl!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!csusac.ecs.csus.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!linley From: linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley) Subject: Re: When does the sales tax go DOWN? Message-ID: <linleyCsnro9.KCA@netcom.com> Organization: UCLA Alumnus, Computer Science & Engineering References: <linleyCsA91y.FnK@netcom.com> <2vka8k$4r@crl.crl.com> <2vkpnd$k6u@usc.edu> Distribution: ca Date: Sat, 9 Jul 1994 05:38:33 GMT Lines: 53