Article View: ca.general
Article #2173Re: Any uBid dealings?
From: Jeremiah Kristal
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:04
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:04
42 lines
2964 bytes
2964 bytes
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:09:41 GMT, julius <JULIUS47L@AOL.COM> wrote: >I tried to bid on their products, but every time when the bidding >was almost over the minimum bidding price was so high that >it didn't make sense to bid.Tried it for 2 weeks and couldn't >get a bargain.Ebay is better. I've bought many items from UBid and have generally been satisfied with the service. Every piece I purchased was as advertised, and arrived as promised. I have purchased several refurbished items there, but they were always clearly marked as such. I think the $50 coupon was a reasonable offer. You most likely could have had them take the piece back and cover your shipping. (I know at least two people who did this for no reason other than buyer's remorse.) Jeremiah > > >Eric wrote: > >> I was wondering if anyone has had any dealing with uBid.com (both bad >> and good). The reason is that they advertised a product as new. My bid >> >> was accepted and confirmed. When I got the product the packaging was >> clearly labeled as reburished. When I called their customer support the >> >> most they were willing to do was to accept the return of the unit for a >> refund or offer a $25 coupon at their store. I don't know about anyone >> else, but I wouldn't buy anything at a store that had just deceived me. >> When I asked to speak with a manager, he upped the coupon to $50 but was >> >> unwilling to send a new unit as was advertised or cover the price >> difference between what I paid and what a new unit would go for (turns >> out to be approx $25). The manager went on to state that it was their >> mistake and that they don't review all of the product descriptions. So >> something listed as new might very well be refurbished. Unfortunately I >> didn't look at resellerratings.com before ordering otherwise I wouldn't >> have placed a bid. >> >> thanks in advance..... >> Eric
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<urhk5t8tf57sc9i4q6g4bqq5eclujnr5sd@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!nntp2.nac.net!gin.w86th.comReferences:
<3A4BE73C.F6FB644A@attglobal.net> <3A4FBD9F.A6B09C4C@AOL.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,127666f96c83678b X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 10675b,127666f96c83678b X-Google-Attributes: gid10675b,public X-Google-Thread: 111dad,127666f96c83678b X-Google-Attributes: gid111dad,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-08 15:04:05 PST From: Jeremiah Kristal <jeremiah@bbi.com> Newsgroups: ca.general,nyc.general,ca.forsale Subject: Re: Any uBid dealings? Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:04:36 -0500 Message-ID: <urhk5t8tf57sc9i4q6g4bqq5eclujnr5sd@4ax.com> References: <3A4BE73C.F6FB644A@attglobal.net> <3A4FBD9F.A6B09C4C@AOL.COM> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: gin.w86th.com X-Trace: 8 Jan 2001 18:00:42 -0500, gin.w86th.com Lines: 43 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!nntp2.nac.net!gin.w86th.com