Article View: ca.general
Article #22197Re: LA metro
From: "Michael S. Ludwig"
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1992 12:25
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1992 12:25
24 lines
1660 bytes
1660 bytes
compata@cup.portal.com (David H Close) writes: = Cost per person-mile, all quantifiable costs considered. The LA metro = will be heavily subsidized; the fare won't cover even half the direct = costs of operation. I assume you've heard this fact stated for the L.A. Metro system, since different transit systems have different farebox-income-to-operating-costs ratios. And they can be pretty high : for the San Diego Trolley, income from fares is ninety-something percent of operating costs. = On the other hand, taxes on motor vehicles, = including gasoline and registration, bring in more than is spent on = road maintenance and smog control. I've heard that the opposite is true : that the cars/roads system is subsidised about as much as bus and train systems are. I can't show this now, but I'll try to get some support for this. Those people who use Carter as an excuse | Michael Ludwig to be against Clinton are quite stupid - | what else can you call someone who can't | mludwig@bonnie.ics.uci.edu figure out that Clinton and Carter | are not the same person? | UCI and I don't agree on anything.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9209240525.aa09715@Bonnie.ics.uci.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gatewayReferences:
<66175@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,4a061c20b48169f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-09-23 23:15:16 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
From: mludwig@Bonnie.ICS.UCI.EDU ("Michael S. Ludwig")
Subject: Re: LA metro
Message-ID: <9209240525.aa09715@Bonnie.ics.uci.edu>
Newsgroups: ca.general
Lines: 24
References: <66175@cup.portal.com>
Distribution: ca
Date: 24 Sep 92 12:25:27 GMT